Search This Blog

Friday, September 20, 2013

The Remarkable Voice of Judy Collins, Master of the Modern Art Song


The Remarkable Voice of Judy Collins, Master of the Modern Art Song

By Professor Nathan Bernstein

 

It is a pleasure to introduce today’s guest writer, Professor Nathan Bernstein.  Many readers, who follow great singers and historical operatic recordings on Youtube, will certainly know our author, although not by his real name.  Many will have read the erudite and highly detailed comments of Professor Bernstein, whose Youtube pseudonym is ‘Meltzerboy,” and who signs himself as “Nate.”  In fact, Professor Bernstein possesses a truly formidable knowledge of old classical singers and equally antique recordings.  He and I have conversed often and over a long period of time on Youtube, and I confess that I have learned a lot in so doing!  We both share a particular love of two singers:  Amelita Galli-Curci, and—strange as it may at first seem—Judy Collins.  I believe it dawned on both of us at about the same that “folk singer” is simply an inadequate term to describe the amazing Judy Collins.  She is so much more than that—her music is both intellectual and sophisticated, and often easily on a par with the music of Schumann and Schubert.  She is in fact a master of the modern art song, and her presentations are superlative.  She possesses an extraordinary voice and certainly belongs in the company of the singers one finds on Great Opera Singers!    Edmund StAustell

 

 

     Those who experienced the era of social protest and revolution in the 1960's are no doubt familiar with the voice and singing of Judy Collins, one of the pioneer folk divas of that turbulent period in American history. Folk music, at least as it manifested itself in the United States, was inextricably linked to liberal and leftist causes, although, as Judy Collins' famous contemporary, Joan Baez, once stated, half her songs are a call to activism while the other half serve as a means of escape from the social and political injustices of the times.

     For myself, the first time I heard the voice of Judy Collins in performance was in the 1970's at an outdoor venue: to be exact, Manhattan's Central Park. I clearly remember eagerly waiting in line clutching my ticket, wondering how she would sound live as compared to her voice on records. With many singers, one's first live contact is slightly disappointing since, as most of you may know, modern recordings are the product of several takes, splicing, and many other technological marvels, all of which are designed to package an artist at her absolute best. Therefore, I had my doubts. But all at once I and others waiting on line were treated to the sound of Judy's voice as she was rehearsing a few lines of Leonard Cohen's song "Story of Isaac." My immediate thought was that her voice sounded stronger, fuller, and more beautiful than it had on recordings, and the ensuing concert only confirmed my initial impression.

     How best to describe the voice and singing style of Judy Collins? With respect to the voice itself, one might say it is nearly vibrato-less, silvery, and equalized in all its registers. There is no forcing of tone yet it can at all times be easily and clearly heard without any interfering fuzz. Further, the diction is impeccable and the singing is artistic in that it avoids cheap effects and reveals the musicality as well as musicianship of the singer.  Here is one of her most popular and best-loved songs, “Both Sides Now:”


Sophisticated lyrics and stunning vocalism!  A truly beautiful song, magisterially delivered!

     Judy Collins had originally studied classical piano (similar to opera singers such as Amelita Galli-Curci and Lily Pons) and indeed gave performances of Mozart and Rachmaninoff compositions in public when she was still in her teens. Her piano teacher was one of the first women conductors, Dr. Antonia Brico, about whom Judy later produced an award-nominated documentary. Moreover, Judy grew up in a musical household: her mother played the piano, while her blind father, Chuck Collins, was a well-known radio personality and performer who specialized in the songs of Rodgers and Hart. So how did Judy Collins gravitate from performing the classical piano compositions of Mozart, Debussy, Ravel, and Rachmaninoff, as well as Broadway tunes, to singing folk music?  There were probably several forces at work, but, according to her own testimony, when she first heard Jo Stafford singing "Barbara Allen" on the radio, she was instantly hooked. At the start, Judy Collins was a folksinger pure and simple, performing traditional Irish, Scottish, and English ballads as well as the music of "city" songwriters, such as Bob Dylan, Leonard Cohen, Joni Mitchell, Randy Newman, and several others. She was instrumental in popularizing the songs of Leonard Cohen and Joni Mitchell, in particular, before either of them had record contracts or performed their own compositions on stage. Indeed, she was responsible for Leonard Cohen's career as a performer. In the late 1960's, she was led to her one and only voice teacher, Max Margulies, to whom she admits to owing her vocal prowess and longevity. It was Margulies who shaped her voice from one of a rough (but still beautiful) alto to that of a shimmering soprano with a nearly three-octave range. She worked tirelessly with Margulies on equalizing her registers from top to bottom, on that elusive element of all great singers called phrasing, and on what Margulies spoke of as "clarity."  It was the same method he instilled in the classical singers he taught and coached. Here is an absolute classic of phrasing and style, as well as brilliant musicality.  Written by Collins herself, the astonishing “My Father:”


 
     From that point on, Judy evolved into a chanteuse and song stylist, who would sing not only traditional folk music but Broadway show tunes, art songs of composers such as Ned Rorem, popular music, and songs that can legitimately be called art songs. My next selection is a personal favorite from Judy's earlier years as a balladeer, which she has been reintroducing in several of her concerts of late.  In the heart-breaking “Hills of Shiloh" one can hear the deeper alto quality of Judy's voice at the time:

 

     Apart from her professional acclaim as an accomplished singer and performer, Judy Collins has had more than her share of personal misfortune, including being stricken with polio as a child, a bout of tuberculosis in her twenties, bulimia, clinical depression, alcoholism for more than 20 years, divorce from her first husband, and the suicide of her son, her only child, at the age of 33. Through it all, however, she has managed to persevere with grace and dignity due, in large measure, to the healing power of her singing, performing, and writing in her journal. She has also become a spokesperson for suicide survivors and those who suffer from the disease of alcoholism.

Finally, a piece composed by Judy Collins called "Home Before Dark."


 

THANK YOU!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, September 8, 2013

David Daniels' OSCAR: A REVIEW

Dear Readers:  I am privileged to count, among my acquaintances, many distinguished connoisseurs of great music.  Regular readers of our comments section will recognize today's author by his nom de plume JING, which I respect here.  Let me say only that I have known our author since our university days together, lo these many years (half a century)!, and we share more than a few happy memories.  Today our author reviews the opera Oscar, starring his friend David Daniels, the internationally recognized alto whose work will be familiar to all my readers.  -- Edmund St.Austell

BRIEF BIOGRAPHY OF "JING"

I an not a music reviewer.  I am a retired protestant clergyman.  I am someone who loves opera (as well as other forms of classical theater.) I am a person who has, over my 71 years, sung and acted in high school and college, and professionally and in summer stock and community theater.  I have happily performed in many a church basement and nursing home.  While watching old movies on Turner Classic Movies, I regularly see famous singers and actors I have performed with, but who, unfortunately, few people remember (which means I am not always believed.) These are biases of mine you should be aware of: I love opera and live theater and believe that any critical comments of any production ought to be grounded in humility and gratitude for those who care enough about art to take the risks and make the sacrifices necessary to put something on stage.  This applies especially to new compositions.  I am impatient with anyone who thinks he or she knows enough to correctly predict the ultimate fate of long-term survival of any new work.  My own ultimate critical criteria when I attend the opera are that I stay awake, that I don't lose interest, that I trust I know it in my gut when something is "good" when I continue to be haunted by it.  I remain haunted by productions I have seen sixty years ago.  My final bias is that David Daniels has been a good, kind and generous friend of my wife Lois and me for fifteen years.  Star-struck?  You bet.  But that friendship has provided me with a window into the heart and soul of a person who is at once: pure artist, great performer, down to earth friend, gracious human being, and, importantly, an extraordinarily courageous advocate for gay rights, not only through what he says, but how he lives his life day to day.


OSCAR

Music: Theodore Morrison

Text: John Cox and Theodore Morrison

World Premiere at Santa Fe Opera

July 27, 2013

 

Countertenor David Daniels is a down-to-earth and gracious man with a ready and often raucous sense of humor. And at heart, he is a dedicated artist and gay man. For David, who experienced his share of suffering growing up gay in the South, to appear as the first openly gay opera singer to portray the gay title character of a new opera, one written expressly for him, has been a powerful experience. My wife, Lois, and I were fortunate to see his performance in “Oscar” and spend some time with him one weekend in August.  In conversation, one can sense how intensely he feels about playing the character of Oscar Wilde. He puts it simply, “It has changed me.” I said to him, “This feels like you are a part of something that is more than this opera.” He answered, “You know what? About 20% of it is this opera.”

 


 

 

Oscar Wilde was the “superstar” of late Victorian London, and his fame was complex and precarious. In part it was due to polite society’s uneasiness about his sexual persona (he was married with two children). He was also the public face of the Aesthetic Movement. “The aesthetes’” message was that art has no other purpose than to uplift the human soul through beauty alone. Art for art’s sake. That message offended many Victorians who believed that art must be, above all, morally elevating. Nevertheless, such moralists found it impossible to take their eyes off the messenger – a sensational young wit in elegant velvet attire, foppish hair style, lace cuffs, knee-pants and buckled shoes, who was also a stunning conversationalist, brilliant literary critic and poet, and undoubtedly the greatest comic playwright England had seen in a hundred years. Wilde sat atop a fragile perch. Something was bound to happen. And  in 1895, while still basking in the extraordinary success of “The Importance of Being Ernest,” his tumble began. John Cox writes the following in the program notes for “Oscar.”

 

“The common perception of Oscar Wilde is as a great writer and notorious homosexual. We wish in our opera to accept this duality and modulate it into a perception of him as a tragic hero. The greatness required to qualify for such an upgrade is evident in his brilliant career. As playwright, novelist, poet, journalist, wit, and public personality, he was at least the equal of any contemporary. What we offer here is testimony, suitably inflected for the theater, of the events that turned his comedy to tragedy, plunging him into a purgatory of social humiliation and physical suffering through imprisonment with hard labor, thence to discard him as a spent husk. His resurgence from victim to hero came only posthumously.”

 

This is the frame the opera’s creators chose in order to make dramatic sense out of Wilde’s life, especially its final years. How did all this happen? Cox continues:

 “The gods always prescribe a nemesis to the protagonist in order to engineer his downfall. Oscar’s nemesis took the beautiful form of Lord Alfred Douglas. Bosie Douglas was the youngest son of the Marquess of Queensbury, and they despised one another.  Oscar soon found himself in the cross fire of their enmity when Queensberry raised public objection to Oscar’s relationship with his son, imputing a sexual basis to it. Bosie forced Oscar to sue Queensberry for libel, hoping thereby to disgrace him, but Queensberry won the case, so that disgrace fell on Oscar. He was rapidly put on trial, convicted and jailed for ‘gross indecency.’”

 

The opening chords of the opera are filled with foreboding. The first to appear is Walt Whitman, powerfully sung by the exceptional baritone, Dwayne Croft. He serves as a traditional Greek chorus throughout the work. While some critics have regarded this device as irrelevant and distracting, for me personally, it worked very well. I love Walt Whitman’s poetry, and following his spoken introduction of the story, I began to notice that what Whitman sang comes directly from “Leaves of Grass.”  Both men were great artists whose lives had many parallels, including a veiled sexual life that their respective publics suspected with great ambivalence. In fact, Wilde had visited Whitman in Camden, New Jersey, during Oscar’s famous lecture tour of the U.S. and Canada in 1882. Wilde, a much younger man, esteemed Whitman highly. As a child his mother had read to him from “Leaves of Grass.” Whitman offered Wilde some elderberry wine, and throughout the visit Wilde addressed him with great respect. At one point Wilde declared that he couldn’t bear “to listen to anyone unless he attracts me by a charming style, or by beauty of theme.” “Why, Oscar,” said Whitman, “it always seems to me that the fellow who makes a dead set at beauty is in a bad way. My idea is that beauty is a result, not an abstraction.” Wilde, taken aback, replied, “Yes. I think so too.” After his meeting with Whitman, Wilde said, “I have the kiss of Walt Whitman still on my lips.” For me, the use of Whitman as a commentator on Wilde, as fellow artist, but as critic of “abstraction” makes sense. The arc of the drama of Wilde’s life in “Oscar” reveals his terrible journey from abstract aestheticism to palpable suffering – first through his perilous relationship with Bosie, and then from the pain he underwent in prison.

 

Following the prologue, Act I takes place on the eve of his second trial. Out on bail, Wilde attempts to find a hotel room for the night. But Queensbury has bribed some detectives to harass Wilde, hounding him with brutal anti-gay slurs, and tipping off the night clerks in each hotel that this is Oscar Wilde, the man charged with “gross indecency.” Repeatedly turned away, as he wanders helplessly, the image of Bosie appears to him. Bosie is portrayed by the remarkable dancer Reed Lupau. He is graceful and slight as was the real Bosie. He has no spoken or sung lines and appears frequently throughout the opera, sometimes as himself, sometimes masked as other characters. At Oscar’s insistence Bosie has already fled to France. Bosie never appears in the opera except as a wraith in Oscar’s imagination, a kind of obsession, morphing into a variety of forms, some comforting, some demonic. Though the use of a dancing mute is borrowed from Britten’s “Death in Venice,” I still found it very effective. Wilde maintained that Bosie was “the love of his life” - a love that was tender, obsessive and very dangerous.

 

Wilde at last finds refuge in the home of his old friend Ada Leverson, a writer and mother. The only room she has for him is the nursery, overflowing with toys, rocking horses, stuffed animals, and children’s books. Soprano Heidi Stober was new to me.  Her voice took flight with genuine compassion for Oscar. Their conversation is punctuated by wit and sharp observations, but we instantly know that Wilde is beset by dread and weariness. To calm him, she asks Oscar to read aloud from one of his children’s books.

 

Theodore Morrison’s score is tonal and romantic, avoiding harsh dissonance, but is still replete with surprising turns. For me, the music worked well. This is not a score that is ground-breaking, but it serves the drama very effectively, as words and music nicely embrace. Lois said it felt in places like a “sung play.” The only two arias in the opera belong to Daniels, and the first is in this scene. Oscar sings a brief song in praise of absinthe. Wilde downs several glasses of it (at least the substance looked green to me).  Ada leaves briefly, and Bosie re-appears to Oscar. They join in a gentle dance and embrace. This leads to the beautiful aria “My sweet rose,” overflowing with yearning. The tri-tonal nature of the refrain (using the so-called “devil’s interval”) is uncanny, yet genuinely moving. Daniels sings with a legato of sheer beauty with none of the vibrato-less “eeriness” that was once so widely expected of countertenors. No recorded music from “Oscar” is readily available. Here, however, is Daniels singing with similar feeling, but in a very different style. This is ”Ch’io parta?” (“Must I leave?”) from Partenope by Handel.  It captures heart break not unlike what Oscar feels. This aria is a personal favorite from the first opera I saw Daniels in.

 


 


 

Into the scene then enters another of Oscar’s friends, the writer Frank Harris. Tenor William Burden, another rising star with Santa Fe experience, sings beautifully and dramatically.  Unlike Ada, he is a friend whose dominant personality has often clashed th Wilde’s ego. Word of Harris’ arrival sends Wilde into retreat from the nursery to gather himself for the encounter, with some very funny lines about what it is like to be around Frank. But when he
 returns Frank and Ada try desperately to convince Oscar to flee England at once. Harris says he has readied a yacht to take him away. They argue that he owes it to himself and to his wife and children to find safety. Their soaring duet expresses the special love they share for Oscar and the ardent desire to protect him from the cruelty that is bound to engulf him. When he seems at first to agree, Ada and Frank depart and we witness Oscar’s genuine struggle to decide. I have seen David Daniels on stage many times over the
 years, but this is his finest acting. Bosie returns and we begin to see the depth of Oscar’s anguish. Now he makes the “moral” decision to be true to who he really is. He will stay and defend himself, and he will accept the consequences. Gone now are his off-hand dismissals of what prison might be like. He has begun to realize the truth of what is happening to him.

 

 

 

The next selection is “Welcome Wanderer” from A Midsummer Night’s Dream by Benjamin Britten. Britten is said to be a big musical influence on Theodore Morrison. Here Daniels plays Oberon. Puck is silent, though he speaks elsewhere in the opera. This music is much closer in style to “Oscar” than my other selections. And though Oberon and Puck are not Oscar and Bosie, this shows an interaction between a singer and a mute actor suggestive of the one in “Oscar.”

 


 Act I ends with a wild and bizarre depiction of the trial itself. Instead of the familiar tense “courtroom drama,” the nursery is transformed into a crazed menagerie of prancing hobby horses, dancing Raggedy Ann dolls, stuffed animals, and wooden soldiers - all toys gone bad - evoking a travesty, presided over by a judge who is a bouncing jack-in-the box. (played by the remarkable young bass Kevin Burdette). This scene has been criticized as over the top. And it is, but I found it amazing theatre. The phrase “mockery of justice” rolls off the tongue today so easily that it has lost the sense of outrage it actually implies. But here it is recovered. As the guilty verdict is rendered, the music swells, and Oscar Wilde, the accused in the dock (which has been a baby’s crib) finds himself condemned as the slats of the crib are transformed into slowly rising bars. And the music swells to the strains of “Hail Britannia!”

 

 

 

Act II takes place in Reading Gaol. For many today, Wilde’s two-year imprisonment is a footnote to his life. But the opera reminds us that Victorian prisons were no minimum security spas for the rich and famous. They were brutal, degrading, and fully dedicated to the destruction of body and spirit. This mission is proudly announced by Colonel Isaacson, the governor (warden), upon Wilde’s arrival. Kevin Burdette returns to play him as malevolence incarnate. Wilde appears shackled and still attired in his red velvet smoking jacket. Gone now is any trace of wit or irony. He stands in dazed silence as what awaits him is read aloud:  No speaking to another prisoner at any time, hard labor, no pen and paper of any kind, no reading material. With piteous humility, Oscar asks “May I not have some book to bring solace to my soul?” This is briskly denied by Governor Isaacson, who informs Oscar that he has no soul, and reminds him that the purpose of his stay in Reading Gaol is to be reduced to nothing. Then, piece by piece, his clothing is discarded and he dons his gray prison suit. Escorted to his cell, a cage, he is introduced to the machine upon which his hard labor is to be performed. It is a fiendish metal device with a crank attached. Each time the prisoner turns this crank, one revolution is registered and retained for an endless record.

 

Wilde is required to attend a church service. Standing in line with the other prisoners, he collapses, is made to stand again, and again falls to the ground. His head now injured, the governor finally orders him to the infirmary. There takes place what, for me, is the most moving scene of the opera. He shares this brief respite from the horrors of the prison with two other inmates, all three barely able to move from their beds. One of them has heard of Oscar. Respectfully he asks Wilde what he thinks of Dickens. Oscar is tempted to summon his mocking wit, but at once realizes how humble the man is. Though all have been living in hell, Oscar is now able to newly connect with another broken human being. He is learning from their suffering and from his own. A moment that still brings tears to my eyes is when Wilde has difficulty getting comfortable enough to sleep and his new friend leaves his own bunk, goes to Wilde’s bedside, unfolds his blanket, and gently tucks him in. Oscar would later write, “There is no prison in any world into which love cannot force an entrance.”

 

Before leaving the infirmary, Oscar learns that a prisoner is to be hanged, a man who murdered his wife by cutting her throat. As the time approaches, tension among the inmates rises to a frenzy. Bosie, masked as Death itself, swirls through the prison like a whirlwind, his dancing spectacular in its choreography. The prisoners sing a poignant and haunting chorus, with lyrics taken directly from “The Ballad of Reading Gaol.” Here Morrison’s mastery of choral composition is truly impressive. The hanging is enacted in a brutally explicit and ghastly way. It is riveting. The masked executioner is revealed to be Bosie.

 

 

 

Eventually the sadistic Isaacson is replaced. Wilde, now nearing the end of his two-years, is allowed pen and paper and books. His last visit is from Ada. In a letter to her, he had expressed his desire, on release, to be received into a Christian monastery. She sadly informs him that the request has been denied. Wilde is resigned and she is sorrowful as they part. (For three years after his release, Wilde wandered in exile in France seeking spiritual redemption; broken in health, penniless, never to see his wife and children again. Oscar Wilde died in a shabby Paris hotel room. His oft quoted famous last words are likely apocryphal, a variation on an earlier observation to friends: “My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death. One of us has got to go.”)

 

The opera, itself, ends in a startling way. Walt Whitman, long dead, appears again. From his vantage point in heaven, he welcomes Oscar Wilde into a firmament that is home to the souls of the great, good and wise ones of human history. The music soars and is wonderfully triumphant. It is, well, quite operatic! And the opera’s final words belong to Oscar. Amazed and surrounded by those who have just welcomed him into glory, he turns to face us and sings: “For myself the only immortality I desire is to invent a new sauce.” This, it seems to me, is a perfect ending. It is as if to say, “La tragedia è finita.”

 

This final selection is “Barbaro Traidor” from a recording session for the opera Bajazet, by Antonio Vivaldi. Here is Daniels with Fabio Biondi conducting Europa Galante. Imagine it as Oscar Wilde having fun in heaven with some wonderful friends. Please skip the ad, since no such thing can exist in heaven. 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, August 24, 2013

100 YEARS OF RICHARD TUCKER, BY HENRY R. TUCKER



On Wednesday, August 28, the operatic world will celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Richard Tucker.  For this very special occasion, I am privileged to feature a commemorative article by Henry R. Tucker, one of the legendary tenor's three sons.  I have also invited Dr. James A. Drake, the great tenor's authorized biographer, to introduce Mr. Tucker to our readers.

"Henry R. Tucker, an attorney-at-law and insurance broker, has a formidable knowledge of his father's recordings, roles, and artistic legacy," writes Dr. Drake.

"With his two brothers, Barry Tucker (a Manhattan stockbroker and the longtime president of the Richard Tucker Music Foundation) and Dr. David Tucker (an ophthalmologist and adjunct professor of medicine at New York University), Henry Tucker is able to speak about his legendary father from an enviable perspective.

"Among his many priceless memories is being with his brother Barry in their father's dressing room between acts during a 1973 Metropolitan Opera radio broadcast of 'La Boheme,' when Luciano Pavarotti telephoned the dressing room to say, 'You have shown us again, Richard, that you are still the king!'

"It is especially fitting that the blog 'Great Opera Singers,' through its creator Edmund St. Austell, will enable Henry Tucker to share with readers around the world not only his thoughts and perspectives, but also an array of audio and video recordings that illustrate the evolvement of Richard Tucker's voice from a youthful lyric tenor into a lirico-spinto voice of dramatic intensity."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the youngest of the three sons of Richard and Sara Tucker, there is a sense in which I grew up with my father.  I was born during his second season at the Metropolitan Opera, when my father was only thirty-two years old.  In fact, my birth on January 30, 1946, occurred between performances:  three nights before I was born, my father sang excepts from "Rigoletto" and "La Forza del Destino" in a gala concert at the Met; and a few days afterward, he sang parts of "Traviata" and "Rigoletto" in another Met concert.  The opera season doesn't stop for newborns.

By the time of my Bar Mitzvah in 1959, when I turned thirteen, my father's voice had matured into a lirico-spinto tenor, and he had reached what most critics regarded as the apex of his career.  He was then forty-five.  He was internationally known, his photo had appeared on the cover of national magazines, and he had already been labeled "the American Caruso."  My father, however, had a different view of his career at that point.  He believed that he was just getting started.

Except for a ten-year period in which he made no commercial recordings (there were contractual reasons involved), most of my father's career and the steady, progressive maturation of his voice are reasonably well documented, thanks to the emergence of magnetic tape recording and the affordability of portable audio-recording equipment in the 1950s.

Fortunately too, some of his televised performances were captured by "kinescope" (a late-1940’s technology in which a motion-picture camera was used to film whatever appeared on a television screen), and several years later on videotape, a technology that had not even been conceived when my father made his Met debut.

Only four years after his debut (as Enzo in "La Gioconda" on January 25, 1945), my father co-starred in one of the milestones in the early history of network television.  This milestone event took place on two consecutive Saturday nights in the spring of 1949, when the NBC network televised a concertized performance of Verdi's "Aida," under the baton of the incomparable Arturo Toscanini.   For the principals in the cast, Toscanini had chosen mainly American singers, each of whom he had meticulously coached and rehearsed.

Although the Maestro chose my father for the telecast, it took his skills as a salesman (earlier, my father had sold silk linings in the Manhattan fur market) to persuade Toscanini to cast him as Radames.  During my father's audition, Toscanini asked him to sing "Celeste Aida." When no notes of the famous aria were forthcoming, he had to confess to the Maestro that he had never sung "Celeste Aida" and didn't know any of the other music in the score.

"Tell me, Tucker," Toscanini indignantly exclaimed, "Why should I bother with you when you do not even know one note of 'Celeste Aida,' and not one note of the entire opera?"  My father's reply was what earned him the role of Radames:  "Because you, Maestro, will teach me 'Aida,' and then it will be 100% correct!"

That was precisely what Toscanini needed to hear in order to convince him to give my father the role.  In the young Richard Tucker, the Maestro had found a young tenor for whom "Aida" was a blank slate, who had no pre-conceived interpretation of the role and music of Radames, and who would have nothing to "un-learn" in order to meet Toscanini's exceedingly high standards.

Because "Celeste Aida" is the first full aria in the score of "Aida," most tenors find it very unsettling because its range is extensive (the climax of the aria is a high B-flat), and the tenor has no opportunity to "warm up" the voice before launching into such taxing, intense music.

My father, however, relished the challenge.  To him, the opportunity to perform "Aida" in front of the cameras for millions of television viewers, made him feel like Ted Williams stepping into the batter's box.  In fact, the phrase "home run" was how my father often described his mindset when he was ready to go onstage.  As this kinescope from the 1949 "Aida" telecast will attest, he hit the ball out of the park in "Celeste Aida":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6kyk8AkdWs

Although my father's performance in the "Aida" telecast was uniformly praised at the time, he waited until January 1965 before he added Radames to the roster of his Metropolitan roles.  He was acutely aware that singing the role in two consecutive concerts in a television studio was not at all like performing "Aida" as a complete opera in the cavernous Metropolitan Opera House.

Even by 1949, however, my father's voice had matured noticeably, compared to his timbre before he made his Met debut.  This undated recording of Rachmaninoff's "In the Silence of the Secret Night," which he apparently sang in a broadcast on the WEVD radio station in New York in the early 1940’s illustrates the lyrical quality of his youthful voice and his early mastery of mezza voce technique.  The Rachmaninoff song begins at 3:10 in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFGRWWeXi4E&feature=youtu.be

Whenever my father was asked where he had learned his impeccable vocal technique, he always credited his teacher, Paul Althouse, the first American-born tenor to be engaged by the Metropolitan Opera without any prior European experience.  (On the subject of teachers, Paul Althouse was the only teacher my father ever had.  Any mention of other alleged "teachers" is nothing but unfounded speculation.)  Until Paul Althouse's death in 1954, my father went to him for a lesson immediately before each of his performances at the Metropolitan.

As those who are familiar with Richard Tucker’s career will know, he had served as the cantor for three prestigious synagogues in the New York area before he began studying with Althouse.  Unquestionably, the cantorate was the foundation of his eventual success as an opera singer.  In his boyhood, when he was known as Ruby Tucker (his birth name was Rubin, and he was always called "Ruby" by his family and close friends), he had been taken by his father to cantor Samuel Weisser, who heard much promise in the soaring alto voice my father possessed as a boy.

When his voice changed after puberty, my father was accepted into the Zavel Zilberts choir, which performed Jewish music throughout the New York area.  After that, he became a part-time cantor and was supplementing his main income as a salesman when he married my mother in February 1936.

It was my maternal grandfather, Louis (Levi) Perelmuth, who helped my father develop as a cantor by arranging for Joseph Mirsky, another young cantor, to teach my father the intricate stylistic nuances of "chazzanuth," the Hebrew term for cantorial singing.  As with Paul Althouse, his teacher, and Joseph Garnett, who coached my father in his operatic roles, Joseph Mirsky became an integral member of the Richard Tucker "team."  Another vital influence in his cantorial singing was the composer Sholom Secunda, whose liturgical and folk music my father sang on radio, in concerts and on recordings.

It was at the Brooklyn Jewish Center, which was then the largest synagogue in the New York area, that Edward Johnson, the general manager of the Metropolitan Opera, came to hear my father sing a Shabbos Eve service on a Friday evening, and another service at 9:30 on Shabbos, the next morning.  After the second service, Edward Johnson and Frank St. Leger, one of his assistants, knocked on the door of the closet-size room that my father used as an office.  When he opened the door, my father was so surprised by their presence that he could only manage to say, "What are you gentlemen doing here?"

Johnson explained that for several months Wilfrid Pelletier, one of the Met's long-time conductors, had been urging Johnson to hear this phenomenal young cantor at the Brooklyn Jewish Center.  Johnson did so, and immediately promised my father an audition at the Met, which was arranged soon afterward.  A contract for the 1944-1945 season was then drawn up, and my father began preparing the role of Enzo for his upcoming debut.  From then until Edward Johnson retired as general manager in 1949, he and my father maintained a close and mutually beneficial relationship.

When he signed his first contract with the Met, it was not easy for my father to resign as cantor of the Brooklyn Jewish Center, even though he had now reached the goal that he had confided to my mother when they became engaged.  "Someday I'm going to make it big as an opera singer," he had told her confidently.  "And I promise you, Sara, that like a rosebud, I will grow and blossom every year."

Although it was a foregone conclusion that he would have to leave the pulpit, he continued to officiate during the Jewish High Holy Days and on Passover in the cotillion room of the Concord Hotel in the Catskills, and later at the Park Synagogue in Chicago.  At the Concord, from age ten to fourteen, I had the privilege of standing next to my father, with Sholom Secunda conducting the choir, singing one of the final prayers of the service, “Ein Keloheinu.”

Additionally, every other summer my father and mother traveled to Israel for him to sing concerts with the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra.  Because of his close association with the Israeli musical community, he also played a role in securing an appointment in 1969 for a young Zubin Mehta to become Music Advisor to the Israel Philharmonic.

At the Metropolitan Opera, when Rudolf (later Sir Rudolf) Bing succeeded Edward Johnson as general manager, my father was one of the very first singers to be re-engaged by the new administration.  As Sir Rudolf later wrote in his autobiography, he immediately re-engaged my father "out of fear [that] someone in Europe would hear this remarkably beautiful voice and steal this man away."

Early in his tenure at the Metropolitan's helm, Bing recruited notable theater directors from the New York stage to create imaginative new productions for the Metropolitan Opera.  Among these was a new production of Mozart's "Cosi fan tutte," conceived and directed by Alfred Lunt in collaboration with set designer Rolf Gerard and conductor Fritz Stiedry.  Although the production was given in English rather than Italian, my father's performance of "Un' aura amorosa" (or "My Love Is a Flower" in English) displayed his affinity for Mozart, whose vocal music he often described as " jelly for the throat":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89EfFpQea7I&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9c9ZgqnBigre2NZdOA8diw

One of the most successful productions of the new Bing administration was the revival and re-conception of Bizet's "Carmen" by the London stage director (Sir) Tyrone Guthrie, which Met audiences saw and heard for the first time in January 1952.  In this "live" recording from the first radio broadcast of the revival, my father sings the plaintive "Air de la Fleur":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zafCMrasZNc&feature=email

Throughout the 1950’s, my father continued to add new roles to his repertoire at the Met.  Because he was not a formally educated musician, he learned all of his roles by memorizing the music and libretto under the guidance of Joe Garnett, his coach.  One of the many operas in which Garnett prepared him was Giordano's "Andrea Chenier."  In this September 1958 excerpt from Ed Sullivan's then-popular television show, my father and one of his favorite sopranos, Renata Tebaldi, sing the climactic duet "Vicino a te":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spztxFld42Q&feature=email

As he added newer roles to his repertoire, he retained a special fondness for his debut role, Enzo in "Gioconda."  As this "live" recording from a 1959 radio broadcast confirms (and personally this is my favorite rendition of this aria), his singing of "Cielo e mar" was just as poetic but much more clarion, especially his high notes, than when he made his debut fourteen seasons earlier:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtnD37DDERw&feature=email

The title role in Gounod's "Faust" entered my father's repertory at the Met in January 1951.  It was not a role that he sang regularly, however; it was eclipsed by his much more numerous appearances in such operas as "Rigoletto," "Cavalleria Rusticana," "La Traviata," "La Boheme" and others in the early 1950’s.  But in concert, and in this case on network television, he occasionally sang the demanding aria "Salut, demure chaste e pure":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8soQhDVNjxU

Although he sang a number of roles in the French repertoire, it was the operas of Verdi, Puccini, Leoncavallo, Giordano and Mascagni that became the mainstays of my father’s long and distinguished career.  One of his favorite Puccini roles was that of Mario Cavaradossi in "Tosca."  When he sang "E lucevan le stelle," he always infused the aria with fiery intensity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bH3XRxSQLQ

The verismo tradition in the Italian repertoire gave my father many of his memorable roles--but he was very prudent about not taking on a particular role until he and his coach felt that his voice was mature enough for weightier operatic parts.  In addition to his coach, my father also relied upon my mother's keen sense of what was right for him as his voice grew in power.

Although she was not a musician, my mother had an unerring ear for my father's singing.  She also knew how he relished new challenges, especially new roles.  But if she sensed he was considering a role that she thought was not appropriate for him, she would merely say very calmly, "It's not for you, Ruby."  Never once did I hear him question her judgment.

The role of Canio in "Pagliacci" was another example of an opera that my father did not add to his repertoire until much later in his career.  When he finally felt ready to sing the role in the opera house, his searing portrayal of the tragic clown became his signature role in the early 1970’s, when the Met unveiled new productions of "Cav" and "Pag" by the renowned theater director and filmmaker Franco Zeffirelli, with Leonard Bernstein conducting.

Although a network-quality video recording of a complete performance of my father singing "Pacliacci" exists, it has never been shown publicly for legal reasons.  Fortunately, however, there are videos of him singing "Vesti la giubba" from a television program in which he performed the aria several years earlier:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj-D82L4wSQ&feature=youtu.be


The date of April 11, 1970 marked the gala celebration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of my father's Metropolitan Opera debut.  For his anniversary, he was given carte blanche to choose whatever he wanted to perform on that historic evening.  He chose specific acts from three operas, in each of which he was paired with a different soprano of his choosing:  the first act of "La Traviata," with Joan Sutherland; the second act of "La Gioconda," with Renata Tebaldi; and the third act of "Aida" with Leontyne Price.  Each act was conducted by three of his favorite maestri:  Richard Bonynge (for "La Traviata"), Kurt Herbert Adler (for "La Gioconda"), and Francesco Molinari-Pradelli (for "Aida").

Alfredo in "La Traviata" was always one of my father's favorite roles.  He sang it at the Met for the last time in September 1967, when he put it aside as he took on heavier roles.  Fortunately for posterity, a video recording exists of an impromptu, playful rendition of the "Libiamo" duet, with my father singing Alfredo to the Violetta of Licia Albanese at the 75th birthday party for the conductor Wilfrid Pelletier, whose encouragement had meant so much to my father decades earlier.  Maestro Pelletier accompanies them at the piano--and the lady in the pink dress standing next to Licia Albanese in the bend of the piano is Sara Tucker, my mother:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXVeSmI5qVY&feature=youtu.be

One of the most memorable events in the twentieth-century history of the Metropolitan Opera was the star-studded gala performance honoring the leadership and legacy of Sir Rudolf Bing when he announced his retirement as general manager.  The gala was televised world-wide, and most every notable Metropolitan artist was featured in the ensembles that Sir Rudolf had selected for his gala.

For one of these selections, my father was paired with his long-time friend Robert Merrill in one of the duets from "La Forza del Destino."  Merrill, by his own admission, was very nervous while he and my father waited in the dressing they shared during the gala.  My ever-confident father, on the contrary, exhorted Merrill to join with him in a rendition that, in his words, "will make the mothers of the rest of these singers forget their names."

When their moment in the gala finally arrived and they were waiting in the wings, my father kept prodding Merrill to give the performance of his life.  To add to his prodding, he grabbed Merrill by the shoulder as they were ready to walk onstage.  "Remember, Merrill, no goddamned bunting tonight!" he barked.  "It's gotta be a home run!  Nothing less!"  The videotape of the dramatic duet, "Le minaccie i fieri accenti," went so spectacularly that my father can actually be seen skipping off the stage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-FOUTf0Ye4&feature=em-share_video_user

While there are several videotaped performances of my father in his various signature roles, that of Des Grieux in Puccini's “Manon Lescaut" was his personal favorite throughout his Metropolitan career.  I can vividly remember the emotion he showed when he described to my mother and my brothers how much Des Grieux meant to him, and how deeply he identified with the music and the character.  When he was invited to perform one of the arias on television, he sang "Guardate! Pazzo Son!" with a vocal and dramatic intensity that can only be described as white hot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHFCORFuYps&feature=email

At the Metropolitan Opera House and on tour, my father not only sang more performances than almost any other leading tenor, but he also helped secure opportunities for younger tenor colleagues like Luciano Pavarotti and Placido Domingo, who were then beginning their Metropolitan careers.  He also became friends with some of his supposed rivals such as Franco Corelli, and earlier Mario del Monaco.

For a career that began in the 1930’s with little more than the unshakable self-confidence my father had, his life ended just as he was in the midst of a new dramatic period in his thirty-year career.  As in-house recordings from the 1970’s confirm, he continued to pour every ounce of himself into every performance he sang.

What he did his best to repress, however, was that he had already had a major heart attack earlier in his career--a diagnosis that he had categorically denied.  But on January 8, 1975, while he was on tour with Robert Merrill in a series of joint concerts, my father had a massive, fatal heart attack.  He was only 61 years old, and was still at the peak of his career.

The day after his sudden passing, my mother and my eldest brother Barry went privately to meet with Schuyler Chapin, who had recently become the Met's new general manager.  They asked for an unprecedented favor from the Met administration:  to be able to hold my father's memorial service on the Metropolitan Opera stage.  Mr. Chapin quickly polled the Met's board of directors, who gave their permission for the memorial service.  Afterward, my father was laid to his rest in the family plot in the Mount Lebanon Cemetery in the New York area.

Soon after the funeral, my mother, my brother Barry, and Herman Krawitz of the Metropolitan administration, formulated tentative plans to create the Richard Tucker Music Foundation in order to perpetuate my father’s legacy and to offer substantial financial grants to promising young singers in the future.  Under the visionary leadership of my brother Barry, the Foundation has now become one of the largest and most prestigious music foundations in the world.  Numerous singers who are now internationally famous can trace the roots of their success to the support they received from the Richard Tucker Music Foundation.

For my part, and I feel confident that I can speak for my brothers on this subject, it seems impossible to envision my father at the age of 100.  I prefer to remember him in the full bloom of his life, when his energy, vitality, and self-confidence permeated everything he undertook.  One of the finest tributes he received was from the late Francis Robinson, who said in a tribute that my father’s voice “had incomparable beauty, sweetness and lyricism coupled with an extraordinary upper register that punished B-flats and B-naturals as they echoed from the parterre boxes of the Old Met.”

Many stellar tenors have been deservedly praised for their artistic contributions to operatic history.  There have been tenors who had incredibly beautiful voices and formidable techniques that enabled them to add impressive ornamentations and embellishments to the music and roles they sang.  But in my personal opinion, none of them could match Richard Tucker for his consistency and longevity in such operas as “La Forza del Destino,” “Pagliacci,” “Manon Lescaut,” “La Gioconda,” "Andrea Chenier," “Un Ballo in Maschera,” and in such memorable scenes as the third act of “La Boheme.”

What I consider the most important attribute of my father’s legacy, and a point that is beyond dispute in my judgment, is that he is the finest Italian tenor that America has ever produced, and will be included in the pantheon of opera singers as one of the greatest tenors ever.

Henry R. Tucker

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Max Lorenz: Germany's Answer to Lauritz Melchior


 

Today I am pleased to offer to readers another guest commentary by Mr. Darren Seacliffe, from Singapore. Darren is an undergraduate student in his early 20's, pursuing a degree in a private university in Singapore. His interest in both opera and operetta spans a wide variety of genres, from Rossini to German operetta to Wagner! I will only add that Mr. Seacliffe's knowledge of opera, especially for one so young, is truly extraordinary!  Today, he presents a detailed analysis and comparative study of two great Heldentenors, Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior, dwelling principally upon German tenor Max Lorenz!.


 

Lauritz Melchior, the Great Dane, is unanimously regarded by most critics and connoisseurs, especially those in the Anglo-American musical circles, to have been the greatest Heldentenor of all time. However, in recent years, the name of another Heldentenor, Max Lorenz, a contemporary of the Great Dane, has been brought up as an alternative candidate for this illustrious title. Like all great men, Max Lorenz remains surrounded by controversy even to this very day. To the Germans, he was the greatest Heldentenor they ever had. To the English and the Americans, he was an  overrated Heldentenor who supposedly only got his big break because Lauritz Melchior had abandoned Germany for the US. .

 With the exceptions of Der Fliegende Hollander and Tannhauser, the musical structures of Wagner’s operas tend sometimes not to be very listener-friendly, and can  demand more concentration and greater mental stamina on the part of the listener. Unlike most Italian and French operas, in which one doesn’t have to wait too long between each musical number, the show stoppers in Wagner’s operas are somewhat dispersed. Italian opera ensembles are usually of manageable length; Wagner’s ensembles are often very long, so that only the greatest cast and best conductor can sustain the listener’s attention through them. These two characteristics account for the formidable nature of Wagner’s operas. Nonetheless, with the right performers, it need not appear that way to interested listeners. Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior were two such performers.

Being the most prominent representatives of 2 starkly contrasting approaches to performing Wagner, Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior can both be described as antipodes to one another.  A Lauritz Melchior Wagner performance is a considerably different listening experience from a Max Lorenz one. A  Melchior performance is like a wandering down a meandering river to  Asgard, the world of the gods in Teutonic  mythology.  With his superhuman stamina and velvety rich voice, Melchior renders each Heldentenor role he sings deceptively lyrical. From start to finish, he is able to deliver lyrics so smoothly and easily that he makes  the ‘killer’ roles of Tristan and Siegfried sound no less difficult than the much more commonly performed roles of Lohengrin and Siegmund. In comparison, a Max Lorenz performance is like a bumpy boat trip to Asgard down a surging river current. Lorenz’s singing may not have been as smooth or as easy on the ear as Lauritz Melchior’s, but I feel that his interpretations of the great Heldentenor roles gave more life to the characters he played than Melchior did. As a creature of the stage, Max Lorenz was more imaginative in his characterization. He was less restrained, more passionate and showed more conviction in his performances. More importantly, as a natural tenor, Max Lorenz seemed to have a higher top which made him sound more powerful and heroic than the baritone-turned-tenor Lauritz Melchior.

With such different approaches in singing Wagner, one might be inclined to think that Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior had different singing teachers. The truth, however, was quite different. Both great Heldentenors actually had the same singing teacher, Ernst Grenzebach. As a result, Lorenz was capable of singing passages with almost the same amount of smoothness and ease his fellow student did. Listen to this extract from Lohengrin sung by Max Lorenz with Kate Heidersbach in 1929, and see if you don’t you find his performance uncannily similar to the one by  Melchior.  Lorenz’s singing may not be as poetic as Melchior’s but I feel he sounds slightly more romantic than Melchior in his interpretation of the role.  I find Lorenz’s performance almost as beautiful and as powerful as Melchior’s classic version with Lotte Lehmann. Some  might find this  Lorenz rendition surprisingly different from the one they’ve heard. I think one reason could be the fact he was still using the technique Grenzebach taught him then.


 
After the above performance,  Max Lorenz’s singing technique would begin to deviate from the one Grenzebach had taught him. This was because Max Lorenz always felt that expression was much more important than the beauty of the sound he made. As the man himself once said, ‘I didn’t care much if a tone wasn’t absolutely exquisite. For me, expression was the main thing.’’ To make the dramatic outbursts so typical of his singing, he was sometimes forced to sacrifice single notes and even the musical line. He would drag or chop up the lyrics and/or strain his voice from time to time to make a theatrical statement during his performances. Periodically, he would strain his voice so much, and it became so raw, that some of the notes he produced came out ugly or even ridiculous. On top of that, there were some over-generous helpings of sobbing and declaiming . To the Germans, all these would make his performances sound more powerful and intense than anybody else’s. To the English and the Americans, they made them” hammy.”

While the talent of the great Lauritz Melchior (1890-1973) was discovered relatively early, Max Lorenz (1901-1975) was, in comparison, a late bloomer. Unlike Melchior, who sang in a boys’ choir at an English church, Lorenz at one time got himself thrown out of choir practice for bellowing, roaring and singing off-key. Despite this early setback, however, he never gave up. His deep love of singing made him determined to make a career for himself as an opera singer. Nevertheless, he had to contend with his father’s opposition. Lorenz’s father felt that a musical education was nothing more than a waste of money so Lorenz was forced to take his singing lessons on the sly, with the support and encouragement of his mother. Lorenz initially studied under Prof. Pauli in Cologne. After failing an audition at the Wiesbaden State Opera House, he decided to seek further instruction. In spite of his father’s strong disapproval. However, through the intercession of his mother, Lorenz was able to go to Berlin where he studied under the highly regarded Ernst Grenzebach, who would transform this boy into a master singer.

After going through a rigorous 2-year training regime under the hard taskmaster Grenzebach, in 1926, Max Lorenz was allowed to take part in a singing competition held by a popular magazine, where he won first prize. Shortly after, he was given a contract by Fritz Busch of the Dresden State Opera. During his tenure at the Dresden State Opera, Lorenz initially sang minor roles like Walther von der Vogelweide in Tannhauser. It didn’t take long, however, for Lorenz to get his first big break. After a performance of Richard Strauss’ Salome under the baton of its composer, Strauss was so impressed he offered Lorenz the technically difficult (but unrewarding) role of Menelaus in the opera Die Aegyptische Helena. Lorenz was to obtain his first big success in this role. He continued to prove successful in  singing roles from Richard Strauss’ operas. Some of the roles he sang included Herodes (Salome), Bacchus (Ariadne auf Naxos) and Aeghist (Elektra). It’s a great pity that there are  no recordings of Lorenz’s Menelaus, as far as I know. However, fortunately, Lorenz was captured in his other prime Strauss tenor role, Bacchus, in a 1944 performance of Ariadne staged in celebration of the composer’s 80th birthday. Here is the best part of his performance in this opera, the finale with the legendary soprano Maria Reinin, in the title role:


 In this extract,  Lorenz’s tenor isn’t as raw or ungainly as it was in the rest of this performance or,for that matter, in some other performances during this stage of his career. His singing may not be beautiful in the conventional sense but don’t you feel something when you hear him sing with such passion and fervor? He’s so dramatic I find myself touched by the intensity of his performance. His singing is so powerful that it makes me willing to put up with his throaty voice.

Lorenz’s successful performance in Ariadne auf Naxos took him to the Berlin State Opera and the Vienna State Opera, where his Radames brought him the attention of the Met’s German wing conductor, Artur Bodanzky. Bodanzky would later invite Lorenz to sing at the Met, where he would score his first international success. During Lorenz’s stay at the Met (1931 – 1933), he sang Walther (Die Meistersinger von Nurnberg), Tannhauser, Lohengrin, Siegmund (Die Walkure) and Siegfried . The Americans were especially taken by Lorenz’s youthful Siegfried. His success in America was to earn him an invitation to Bayreuth in 1933, where he would become the finest Heldentenor of his age. (Note: It’s true that by 1933, Lauritz Melchior was no longer performing in Bayreuth. There’s a misconception I heard in some quarters that Max Lorenz only got his chance to perform at Bayreuth because he was the sole Heldentenor in Germany after Melchior’s departure. This is untrue. There were still several other great Heldentenors left in Germany like Set Svanholm, Joachim Sattler and August Seider. Though not as good as Lorenz and Melchior, they were still first-class.)

Besides singing Wagner and Strauss, Max Lorenz was known to make periodic excursions into the non-German operatic repertory. Among his most successful roles in the non-German operatic repertory were the previously-mentioned Radames (Aida), Don Alvaro (La Forza del Destino) and his most famous role after the great Wagner tenor roles, Verdi’s Otello. Lorenz was such a successful Otello that he was repeatedly invited by La Scala to sing the role in Italian there. (Lorenz would ultimately reject La Scala’s invitation because he felt his Italian wasn’t good enough to sing Otello in Italy.) Compare that to Lauritz Melchior, whose repertoire became exclusively limited to Wagner after his move to the Met. It wasn’t that Melchior couldn’t sing the non-German operatic repertoire;before Melchior moved to the Met, he sang a few non-German tenor roles like Otello and Radames in Europe. When he moved to the Met, being a member of its German wing meant that he wasn’t given the chance to sing anything but Wagner there.

 

Unlike  Melchior, who was only able to leave a few selections from Pagliacci, Aida, Otello and L’Africaine as mementoes of his work in the non-German repertoire, Max Lorenz was captured in substantially complete performances of Aida and Un Ballo in Maschera.  Sadly, there aren’t any recordings of his Otello apart from a few excerpts). Here are samples of his work in each of these operas.  First, the young Max Lorenz’s rendition of “Celeste Aida” in German. It is what I would call truly heroic.  He might not be as thrilling as in some his later performances but his vocal display demonstrates considerable power, a portent of  a great dramatic tenor. Notwithstanding his formidable vocal instrument, he was able to scale it down to sound appropriately delicate and tender in the lyrical moments of the aria, a feat few other tenors could replicate:


 
The following excerpt from Un Ballo is most definitely unusual. How often do you hear a fully-fledged Heldentenor attempt a lyric role? At this point, Max Lorenz was already an experienced Siegfried. Though he may sound  throaty here, he absolutely convinces in the tragic role of Riccardo (Gustavus III) with his tearful performance. He sounds as though he’s being torn apart by his love for Hilde Konetzni’s Amelia:


 
Lorenz’s arrival in Bayreuth could not have come at a more opportune time for the opera festival. At that time, Winifred Wagner, the woman in charge of the festival, was trying to re-establish Bayreuth as the premier venue for Wagner performances. Furthermore, the festival’s artistic director, Heinz Tietjen, and its scenic director Emil Pretorius, were trying to stage groundbreaking Wagner performances that were as near to Wagner’s conception as possible. Combining heroic stature and a formidable stage presence, Max Lorenz was the man of the moment, the right man to help them realize these noble aspirations. Heinz Tietjen was to be the man who would bring about the turning point in Max Lorenz’s career. For months, he worked with Lorenz for two to three hours every day, rehearsing every gesture and move with him a hundred times over. Lorenz would become the finest Heldentenor of his age under his mentorship. He was proven to be a success at Bayreuth. With his incredibly expressive voice and his vast reserves of natural energy, Lorenz was the heart and soul of every performance, leaving a lasting impact on his audiences. People thronged to see him and he found himself swamped with wedding proposals. (One American lady was so desperate to marry him that she offered to buy him off his wife for 1 million dollars!)

While Max Lorenz personified the Wagnerian hero in Bayreuth, in the US, Lauritz Melchior was keeping the Wagner dream alive and more importantly, helping the Met stay in business, during the Depression and World War II. Lauritz Melchior’s reputation has survived largely intact into the modern day because of the standard-setting excerpts he recorded in the studios of big recording companies like HMV and RCA Victor, and the considerable number of broadcasts in the Met archives from his heyday. On the other hand, Max Lorenz’s reputation has proven vulnerable to the ravages of time. One reason why his reputation didn’t last as long as Melchior’s did was because until recently, his recordings weren’t as accessible as Melchior’s. Ever since Melchior’s recordings were first released during his lifetime, they have been in circulation. In the case of Max Lorenz’s recordings, as far as I know, they have only been reintroduced to the public not too long ago. Another reason was that while all of Lauritz Melchior’s recordings betray no sign of vocal decline, most of  Lorenz’s complete performances were from the period of his vocal decline, namely the period after 1945. The last reason is because Lorenz has never been well-received by the Anglo-American music critics who continue to hold sway until today, for reasons that I’ve described earlier. Max Lorenz’s greatness was lost on them because they couldn’t understand the words on which he placed so much emphasis in his work.

  Lorenz not only performed the Wagner tenor roles which Lauritz Melchior kept in his active repertoire: Tannhauser, Parsifal, Lohengrin, Tristan, Siegmund and Siegfried, both young and old. He also sang roles which Melchior did not sing such as Walther, Erik (Der Fliegende Hollander) and Rienzi. Tannhauser, Tristan and Siegfried were to become his most famous Wagner tenor roles. (Though Siegmund was a role which Max Lorenz sang relatively often, the Siegmund of choice during his time was Franz Volker, despite Lorenz’s status as Germany’s top Heldentenor.) 
 
Siegfried was the Wagner tenor role which was associated with Max Lorenz during his time at Bayreuth in the 1930s. According to the great Fischer-Dieskau, Lorenz was the only one then who had the immediacy, the fiery temperament and conviction required to play the role. In fact, Lorenz identified so much with the character that he eventually became one with Siegfried when he was singing the role. You can hear it for yourself in these two excerpts I’ve selected.Here is Max Lorenz’s Forging Song, from Siegfried, recorded in 1936, during his prime:

 
And here is his rendition of Siegfried’s Narrative from Gotterdammerung, recorded live under Wilhelm Furtwangler with Ludwig Weber as Hagen. Please bear with the sound. Note that this performance in 1950 was from Lorenz’s twilight years:


I can’t deny that Lauritz Melchior’s version of the Forging Song is easier on the ear and sweeter but is Lorenz’s version more gripping? Though Lorenz may not sound as smooth and easy on the ear as Melchior did, with the fire and poetry he imbues in his performance, his characterization of Siegfried becomes more potent than Melchior’s. If you watch the documentary on Max Lorenz, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQKmK9EUAjc, you will find a small part of the Forging Song in better sound. When you listen to it, you can understand how thrilling his performance could be. Even when Max Lorenz was in his late career, and though his voice had become rawer and drier, in the more tender and more delicate parts of the scene, some poetry still shines through in his singing.

 After the War, Max Lorenz came to be better known for his Tristan than his Siegfried. His Tristan was monumental, not only in vocal terms but also in dramatic terms as well. You can hear it for yourself in this extract taken from a performance of Tristan he recorded when he was at his peak:

 

 
In this performance, I’ll say that Max Lorenz isn’t too far away from the standards Melchior set in the role. This is no small praise considering the fact that Melchior was such a successful Tristan that he has become synonymous with the role.  

It’s incredible how Max Lorenz was able to scale down his loud voice to make his Tristan sound tortured by love. The way he expresses his feelings for his Isolde, Paula Buchner, is so sentimental that one can’t help feeling sorry for this ill-starred pair of lovers. This is truly a first-class rendition of the heartbreaking duet.

 As the finest Heldentenor of his age, Max Lorenz was bound to rub shoulders with the Nazis that ruled Germany during his time in Bayreuth. His athletic physical appearance and his position as the leading Siegfried of his day placed him at the center of a cult in which the Nazis worshipped Wagner as Germany’s greatest composer during a time when the Germans were on a quest to search for heroes that they could look up to. After all, Siegfried was a hero whose name epitomized the powerful and insistent hopes of a vulnerable German people recovering from the debacle of the First World War. (‘Sieg’ and ‘Frieder’, the 2 German words that make up Siegfried’s name mean ‘Victory’ and ‘Peace’ respectively.) The way Lorenz utilized his position made him more than a great singer. It made him a singer greater than most as a person.

 Despite being the Third Reich’s star tenor, Max Lorenz’s life under the Nazi regime was no bed of roses. As a prominent homosexual, Lorenz was in a truly precarious situation. For a short while, he was banned permanently from the German stage after the Nazi authorities caught him in an affair with an assistant conductor.  It was only through Winifred Wagner’s intercession with Hitler that he was able to resume his career. If that wasn’t dangerous enough, Max Lorenz was also married to a Jew, Charlotte Appel. Although he was already in great personal danger, he adamantly refused to divorce his wife, even when the Holocaust was in full swing. Lorenz even insisted that his wife be given her share of the meager privileges to be had during World War II. Things eventually came to a head when the SS came to Lorenz’s house to take his wife and his mother-in-law away. Lorenz’s wife and his mother-in-law were only able to emerge from the experience unscathed when his wife asked Hermann Goering’s sister to intervene in the matter. After the visit, Max Lorenz was able to obtain Goering’s personal protection for his wife and mother-in-law. Besides saving them, Lorenz also used his unique position to hide several colleagues and friends and help them leave Germany. It was true that things could have been much easier for Lorenz if he fled Germany, but being a man who was closely connected to his home and fatherland; it was something he could not do. Moreover, the Nazis didn’t allow him to take his wife abroad.

 For me, as good as Lorenz’s Siegfried and/or Tristan may be, the role which I’ll always associate with Max Lorenz will be his Tannhauser. It was his Tannhauser that kindled an interest in Wagner in me which not even the great Melchior could arouse. Allow me to present the coup de grace from this performance:


 
This excerpt is the best sample of Max Lorenz’s work to show how expressive his singing could be. In hindsight, it’s true that Max Lorenz’s rendition of the Rome Narrative from Wagner’s Tannhauser isn’t conventionally beautiful. Even so, you can’t deny how dramatic it is. I believe that the impassioned nature of his artistry can be traced to his personality. Though always good for a joke in company, Lorenz, in private, like Franco Corelli and several other great singers, was a man plagued by insecurities. He felt the stage compensated for his innate shyness. If you take this into account, I feel one can understand why his performances have such an impact on me. A man afflicted with doubt who drew on the stage for support is an artist well capable of making a character’s last tormented moments sound sickeningly realistic. The stage is the means for him to channel his negative feelings. Here, I’m sure Max Lorenz made full use of that.

 After the War,  Lorenz moved to Vienna, where he became the leading Heldentenor of the Vienna Opera House. Here, he specialized in the roles Tannhauser, Tristan and Verdi’s Otello. He would also spend more time than ever on tour. He began appearing at the Salzburg Festival, where he participated in the performances of several modern works. Many major opera houses around the world invited him for guest performances, where he made a resurgent comeback. Some examples of his more famous guest performances would include the Gotterdammerung he sang at La Scala as part of Furtwangler’s ring cycle, a Tristan he sang there under de Sabata with the great Gertrud Grob-Prandl and a Walkure he sang at the Met with the renowned baritone Joel Berglund. (Note that recordings of these 3 performances exist, though with variable sound quality.) Despite these international successes, it was soon time for Max Lorenz to wind down his hitherto flourishing career.

 By the early 50s, Lorenz’s voice was beginning to show signs of wear and tear. It was only natural after two decades of heavy duty work singing Wagner’s dramatic tenor roles. (Lauritz Melchior, on the contrary, proved immune to the toll of time but his case is more an exception than the norm.) Although Max Lorenz was coming into a phase of vocal decline, he continued to be a first choice singer when it came to casting the operas of Richard Strauss and other modern works. During this stage of his career, instead of playing lead roles in these operas, he would play character roles. An example would be the Drum Major in Berg’s Wozzeck. Nevertheless, there were times when he was still asked to play main roles. He was asked to play the main roles of Josef K. and the Podesta in the operas Der Prozess and Penelope by the composers Gottfried von Einem and Rolf Liebermann respectively. Another new role which he also added to his repertoire was the title role in Pfitzner’s Palestrina.

 Despite  Lorenz’s attempts to expand his repertoire, the curtain was soon to fall on his illustrious career. A new era ushered in a new management regime in the Vienna State Opera House, like all opera houses worldwide. In 1955, Max Lorenz was discharged by the incoming Intendant, Herbert von Karajan, the same way his senior Lauritz Melchior was laid off by the Met’s new General Manager, Rudolf Bing, several years earlier. Lorenz would switch to the Vienna Volksoper where he sang operetta or musical roles like Buffalo Bill, in Annie Get Your Gun (in German, obviously). Nevertheless, from time to time, he would occasionally perform lead roles in various opera houses. Max Lorenz would give his farewell performance in 1962 as Herod in Salome at the Vienna State Opera. It was an ignominious occasion. According to the tenor Waldemar Kmentt, no one from the management came to give him a proper send-off. There were no flowers or anything else for that matter. This in my opinion was a downright shameful way to send off a legendary tenor who had given so much to German musical life during his best years. On Lorenz’s side, when it dawned on him that his singing career was over, he became utterly inconsolable. Legend has it that he was so sad that he was unable to take curtain calls for saying goodbye to his beloved audience, forcing him to leave via a side entrance.

The end of Max Lorenz’s singing career was not the only blow to come to the great singer. Another blow would come when he lost his wife in 1964. It was a blow from which he would never recover. After his retirement, Lorenz was to become a mentor to young singers like Jess Thomas, Jean Cox and most importantly, the great American Heldentenor, James King, with whom he went through all the major Wagner tenor roles and to whom he was closest. He also received visits from former colleagues from time to time. Even so, Lorenz became a very lonely person. Time was certainly not kind to him. Once he had been the No. 1 Heldentenor in Germany, now he was reduced to being a nonentity. His reputation has barely recovered since. If that was not bad enough, he would even find himself classified as something he had never been: a Nazi singer. The misclassification unfortunately remains to this very day in some circles. Only Death would release Max Lorenz from all his woes,on 11 Jan 1975.

To end, if you’re in the mood for adventure or something extreme, please allow me to present to you a sample of Lorenz’s work in modern operas from the final stage of his eminent career. We have a short duet from Berg’s Wozzeck with Christel Goltz. Here, Max Lorenz plays the role of the boorish Drum Major. Doesn’t his raw and dry voice suit the pungent music? He makes his voice so harsh that he sounds as crude as his character here.