To My Readers:
Regarding posting time, I would like to inform you that I
will be posting articles for Great Opera
Singers on Friday evenings from now on.
For years, I have posted these blogs on Sunday, but I have decided to
move the time forward so that the blogs will be available for weekends. Much of my traffic is from abroad, and often
people abroad did not receive the blogs until Monday, their time, and often did
not post comments until Tuesday or later.
By publishing on Friday evening, the blogs should be available
everywhere for the weekends, which is the time most readers have available for
internet reading. I hope this works out
to everyone’s advantage. Thanks! Edmund
Jackie
Evancho: The Phenomenon
I had to think long and hard to decide how such an
article as this, on a 13 year old child, could be framed. The problem is knottier than I had
imagined. Jackie is a child—a talented
one, to be sure, but a girl. She is extremely famous, and almost unbelievably
successful. Does that make her fair game
for reviewing? Some writers and critics
have begun to review her work, and I find that to be inappropriate. I could not and would not do such a thing
myself. I rejoice In her fame and
fortune, but I strongly feel she should be left alone to be a little girl a while longer.
Her day will come. It’s not even
clear what path she will follow. Opera?
I doubt it, personally, but I could be wrong. Theater?
Broadway? Pop? She just did her
first movie, with Robert Redford. Will
she be an actress? Do you see the
problem? What, exactly, is one
reviewing? I say let’s let her be a
little girl while she can! Later. Later.
I first heard of Jackie in 2009, when her mother wrote to
me and sent me a recording of Jackie, then age 9, singing “O Mio Babbino
Caro.” I get a lot of mail of this kind,
and I always take it seriously and give it my close attention. It was immediately apparent that this was an
extraordinary voice for a then 9-year old girl.
I remember telling Mrs. Evancho that I was most impressed with the
voice, but I doubted the wisdom of letting Jackie sing high Bb’s. A nine-year-old voice is a VERY delicate
thing. Pre-pubertal girls and boys have to be treated with the greatest
imaginable care. I also said that unless
my ears deceived me, or unless puberty played a game on us, we were looking at
a potential contralto or mezzo here one day.
I recommended the aria be transposed a third down. I’m happy to say that when Jackie appeared on
“America’s Got Talent,” she did sing this aria down a third (minor third, if I
recall), and the rest, as they say, is history.
The sound this produced was phenomenal, and it’s that phenomenon, that
sound I wish to direct myself to, in a purely analytical way, simply to see if
I can touch on something meaningful. I
would only add that I was most impressed with Mrs. Evancho, a careful, caring
mother, who explored all the reasonable means at her disposal to get Jackie
heard. She wrote to many people, I was
only one of many, and gathered advice. A
careful, sensible procedure. Jackie was,
and remains, in good hands!
Piers Morgan’s comment, after the aria, “Are you sure
you’re not 30,” pretty much sums it up!
That is, of course, what it’s all about.
There is a certain amount of cognitive dissonance here. That teeny, beautiful, 10 year old creature
opens her mouth and out comes a near contralto sound. And this to an audience who had no idea what
was coming. This “Jackie” sound is a
result of having developed, early on, what in the voice training business is
called a “cupola,” which is to say a
large “hood” in the mouth which results from what is basically a big yawn,
creating a kind of echo chamber—an imprecise term, but I’m sure you see the
effect I am describing. It is the
quintessential operatic sound. It is the
opposite of that which is open and piercing.
It could also be called “cover,” which in an adult voice is the result
of a lowered larynx. In adults, we are
used to it. Not in 10 year old little
girls. That, simple as it is, is a huge part
of the Jackie vocal phenomenon at that age.
It was the ultimate attention-getter.
(And, not coincidentally, one of the benefits of singing in Italian!)
Very winning! That
doesn’t change. Suddenly not very
operatic, however. The cover has been
lifted slightly—English will do that!
The voice is, correspondingly, “whiter.”
No problem at all, but a slightly different category starts to come to
mind (and ear): “cross-over.” And this is, in fact, a word used often when
describing much of Jackie’s singing.
We need to hear Jackie today. This is the most recent video I could find,
made a few months ago, and it shows what may—repeat may—be a sign of things to come.
This video is five minutes long, and you may not wish to hear it all,
but a couple of minutes will speak adequately to what we are trying to evaluate
here, and that is simply a description of the phenomenon:
This is pretty straight-forward pop, with a slight cross-over quality on top. : whiter voice, much less
covered, but remarkably pure. That is
perhaps the most remarkable thing about
Jackie’s voice: from the beginning,
there has not been a single hint of harshness, shrillness, edginess, or faulty
intonation. This makes the matter of the
seeming “contralto” sound of age 10 irrelevant.
What we have, consistently, over the period of 3 years, is amazing
purity of intonation and quality! Where
the voice will go is not for me to say.
On a guess, I’d say crossover/pop.
If this were the 1930’s, I’d say movie singer. Whether today’s movie market—I’m thinking of
Chloe Moretz in Kickass and Jennifer
Lawrence in Winter’s Bone, inter alia-- will
support Deanna Durbin-like singing children is anybody’s guess! There are trailers on Youtube of “The Company You Keep,” in which Jackie
has a part. The movie is pretty
grim. Jackie’s part is small but
important, and she does a good job. Redford was impressed with her.
There are of course other factors in the Jackie
phenomenon. One of the most important is
that she is extremely beautiful. NOT an
inconsiderable factor! Also, she is
obviously a very nice kid, being very well raised by her parents. This shines through in everything she
does. All this makes one mightly little
package! Let’s wish her very well. She has some tough years to navigate, but given
how well she’s handled the last three, and how well her parents have done
keeping her centered, my instincts tell me she’ll do just fine!
_________________________________
Comments on this particular article can only be accepted if they are written in the spirit of the article itself, which is to say celebratory, not critical. This is not a review; I will never review the work of children who are currently performing. Edmund StAustell
_________________________________
Comments on this particular article can only be accepted if they are written in the spirit of the article itself, which is to say celebratory, not critical. This is not a review; I will never review the work of children who are currently performing. Edmund StAustell








