Search This Blog

Saturday, August 24, 2013

100 YEARS OF RICHARD TUCKER, BY HENRY R. TUCKER



On Wednesday, August 28, the operatic world will celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Richard Tucker.  For this very special occasion, I am privileged to feature a commemorative article by Henry R. Tucker, one of the legendary tenor's three sons.  I have also invited Dr. James A. Drake, the great tenor's authorized biographer, to introduce Mr. Tucker to our readers.

"Henry R. Tucker, an attorney-at-law and insurance broker, has a formidable knowledge of his father's recordings, roles, and artistic legacy," writes Dr. Drake.

"With his two brothers, Barry Tucker (a Manhattan stockbroker and the longtime president of the Richard Tucker Music Foundation) and Dr. David Tucker (an ophthalmologist and adjunct professor of medicine at New York University), Henry Tucker is able to speak about his legendary father from an enviable perspective.

"Among his many priceless memories is being with his brother Barry in their father's dressing room between acts during a 1973 Metropolitan Opera radio broadcast of 'La Boheme,' when Luciano Pavarotti telephoned the dressing room to say, 'You have shown us again, Richard, that you are still the king!'

"It is especially fitting that the blog 'Great Opera Singers,' through its creator Edmund St. Austell, will enable Henry Tucker to share with readers around the world not only his thoughts and perspectives, but also an array of audio and video recordings that illustrate the evolvement of Richard Tucker's voice from a youthful lyric tenor into a lirico-spinto voice of dramatic intensity."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the youngest of the three sons of Richard and Sara Tucker, there is a sense in which I grew up with my father.  I was born during his second season at the Metropolitan Opera, when my father was only thirty-two years old.  In fact, my birth on January 30, 1946, occurred between performances:  three nights before I was born, my father sang excepts from "Rigoletto" and "La Forza del Destino" in a gala concert at the Met; and a few days afterward, he sang parts of "Traviata" and "Rigoletto" in another Met concert.  The opera season doesn't stop for newborns.

By the time of my Bar Mitzvah in 1959, when I turned thirteen, my father's voice had matured into a lirico-spinto tenor, and he had reached what most critics regarded as the apex of his career.  He was then forty-five.  He was internationally known, his photo had appeared on the cover of national magazines, and he had already been labeled "the American Caruso."  My father, however, had a different view of his career at that point.  He believed that he was just getting started.

Except for a ten-year period in which he made no commercial recordings (there were contractual reasons involved), most of my father's career and the steady, progressive maturation of his voice are reasonably well documented, thanks to the emergence of magnetic tape recording and the affordability of portable audio-recording equipment in the 1950s.

Fortunately too, some of his televised performances were captured by "kinescope" (a late-1940’s technology in which a motion-picture camera was used to film whatever appeared on a television screen), and several years later on videotape, a technology that had not even been conceived when my father made his Met debut.

Only four years after his debut (as Enzo in "La Gioconda" on January 25, 1945), my father co-starred in one of the milestones in the early history of network television.  This milestone event took place on two consecutive Saturday nights in the spring of 1949, when the NBC network televised a concertized performance of Verdi's "Aida," under the baton of the incomparable Arturo Toscanini.   For the principals in the cast, Toscanini had chosen mainly American singers, each of whom he had meticulously coached and rehearsed.

Although the Maestro chose my father for the telecast, it took his skills as a salesman (earlier, my father had sold silk linings in the Manhattan fur market) to persuade Toscanini to cast him as Radames.  During my father's audition, Toscanini asked him to sing "Celeste Aida." When no notes of the famous aria were forthcoming, he had to confess to the Maestro that he had never sung "Celeste Aida" and didn't know any of the other music in the score.

"Tell me, Tucker," Toscanini indignantly exclaimed, "Why should I bother with you when you do not even know one note of 'Celeste Aida,' and not one note of the entire opera?"  My father's reply was what earned him the role of Radames:  "Because you, Maestro, will teach me 'Aida,' and then it will be 100% correct!"

That was precisely what Toscanini needed to hear in order to convince him to give my father the role.  In the young Richard Tucker, the Maestro had found a young tenor for whom "Aida" was a blank slate, who had no pre-conceived interpretation of the role and music of Radames, and who would have nothing to "un-learn" in order to meet Toscanini's exceedingly high standards.

Because "Celeste Aida" is the first full aria in the score of "Aida," most tenors find it very unsettling because its range is extensive (the climax of the aria is a high B-flat), and the tenor has no opportunity to "warm up" the voice before launching into such taxing, intense music.

My father, however, relished the challenge.  To him, the opportunity to perform "Aida" in front of the cameras for millions of television viewers, made him feel like Ted Williams stepping into the batter's box.  In fact, the phrase "home run" was how my father often described his mindset when he was ready to go onstage.  As this kinescope from the 1949 "Aida" telecast will attest, he hit the ball out of the park in "Celeste Aida":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6kyk8AkdWs

Although my father's performance in the "Aida" telecast was uniformly praised at the time, he waited until January 1965 before he added Radames to the roster of his Metropolitan roles.  He was acutely aware that singing the role in two consecutive concerts in a television studio was not at all like performing "Aida" as a complete opera in the cavernous Metropolitan Opera House.

Even by 1949, however, my father's voice had matured noticeably, compared to his timbre before he made his Met debut.  This undated recording of Rachmaninoff's "In the Silence of the Secret Night," which he apparently sang in a broadcast on the WEVD radio station in New York in the early 1940’s illustrates the lyrical quality of his youthful voice and his early mastery of mezza voce technique.  The Rachmaninoff song begins at 3:10 in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFGRWWeXi4E&feature=youtu.be

Whenever my father was asked where he had learned his impeccable vocal technique, he always credited his teacher, Paul Althouse, the first American-born tenor to be engaged by the Metropolitan Opera without any prior European experience.  (On the subject of teachers, Paul Althouse was the only teacher my father ever had.  Any mention of other alleged "teachers" is nothing but unfounded speculation.)  Until Paul Althouse's death in 1954, my father went to him for a lesson immediately before each of his performances at the Metropolitan.

As those who are familiar with Richard Tucker’s career will know, he had served as the cantor for three prestigious synagogues in the New York area before he began studying with Althouse.  Unquestionably, the cantorate was the foundation of his eventual success as an opera singer.  In his boyhood, when he was known as Ruby Tucker (his birth name was Rubin, and he was always called "Ruby" by his family and close friends), he had been taken by his father to cantor Samuel Weisser, who heard much promise in the soaring alto voice my father possessed as a boy.

When his voice changed after puberty, my father was accepted into the Zavel Zilberts choir, which performed Jewish music throughout the New York area.  After that, he became a part-time cantor and was supplementing his main income as a salesman when he married my mother in February 1936.

It was my maternal grandfather, Louis (Levi) Perelmuth, who helped my father develop as a cantor by arranging for Joseph Mirsky, another young cantor, to teach my father the intricate stylistic nuances of "chazzanuth," the Hebrew term for cantorial singing.  As with Paul Althouse, his teacher, and Joseph Garnett, who coached my father in his operatic roles, Joseph Mirsky became an integral member of the Richard Tucker "team."  Another vital influence in his cantorial singing was the composer Sholom Secunda, whose liturgical and folk music my father sang on radio, in concerts and on recordings.

It was at the Brooklyn Jewish Center, which was then the largest synagogue in the New York area, that Edward Johnson, the general manager of the Metropolitan Opera, came to hear my father sing a Shabbos Eve service on a Friday evening, and another service at 9:30 on Shabbos, the next morning.  After the second service, Edward Johnson and Frank St. Leger, one of his assistants, knocked on the door of the closet-size room that my father used as an office.  When he opened the door, my father was so surprised by their presence that he could only manage to say, "What are you gentlemen doing here?"

Johnson explained that for several months Wilfrid Pelletier, one of the Met's long-time conductors, had been urging Johnson to hear this phenomenal young cantor at the Brooklyn Jewish Center.  Johnson did so, and immediately promised my father an audition at the Met, which was arranged soon afterward.  A contract for the 1944-1945 season was then drawn up, and my father began preparing the role of Enzo for his upcoming debut.  From then until Edward Johnson retired as general manager in 1949, he and my father maintained a close and mutually beneficial relationship.

When he signed his first contract with the Met, it was not easy for my father to resign as cantor of the Brooklyn Jewish Center, even though he had now reached the goal that he had confided to my mother when they became engaged.  "Someday I'm going to make it big as an opera singer," he had told her confidently.  "And I promise you, Sara, that like a rosebud, I will grow and blossom every year."

Although it was a foregone conclusion that he would have to leave the pulpit, he continued to officiate during the Jewish High Holy Days and on Passover in the cotillion room of the Concord Hotel in the Catskills, and later at the Park Synagogue in Chicago.  At the Concord, from age ten to fourteen, I had the privilege of standing next to my father, with Sholom Secunda conducting the choir, singing one of the final prayers of the service, “Ein Keloheinu.”

Additionally, every other summer my father and mother traveled to Israel for him to sing concerts with the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra.  Because of his close association with the Israeli musical community, he also played a role in securing an appointment in 1969 for a young Zubin Mehta to become Music Advisor to the Israel Philharmonic.

At the Metropolitan Opera, when Rudolf (later Sir Rudolf) Bing succeeded Edward Johnson as general manager, my father was one of the very first singers to be re-engaged by the new administration.  As Sir Rudolf later wrote in his autobiography, he immediately re-engaged my father "out of fear [that] someone in Europe would hear this remarkably beautiful voice and steal this man away."

Early in his tenure at the Metropolitan's helm, Bing recruited notable theater directors from the New York stage to create imaginative new productions for the Metropolitan Opera.  Among these was a new production of Mozart's "Cosi fan tutte," conceived and directed by Alfred Lunt in collaboration with set designer Rolf Gerard and conductor Fritz Stiedry.  Although the production was given in English rather than Italian, my father's performance of "Un' aura amorosa" (or "My Love Is a Flower" in English) displayed his affinity for Mozart, whose vocal music he often described as " jelly for the throat":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89EfFpQea7I&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9c9ZgqnBigre2NZdOA8diw

One of the most successful productions of the new Bing administration was the revival and re-conception of Bizet's "Carmen" by the London stage director (Sir) Tyrone Guthrie, which Met audiences saw and heard for the first time in January 1952.  In this "live" recording from the first radio broadcast of the revival, my father sings the plaintive "Air de la Fleur":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zafCMrasZNc&feature=email

Throughout the 1950’s, my father continued to add new roles to his repertoire at the Met.  Because he was not a formally educated musician, he learned all of his roles by memorizing the music and libretto under the guidance of Joe Garnett, his coach.  One of the many operas in which Garnett prepared him was Giordano's "Andrea Chenier."  In this September 1958 excerpt from Ed Sullivan's then-popular television show, my father and one of his favorite sopranos, Renata Tebaldi, sing the climactic duet "Vicino a te":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spztxFld42Q&feature=email

As he added newer roles to his repertoire, he retained a special fondness for his debut role, Enzo in "Gioconda."  As this "live" recording from a 1959 radio broadcast confirms (and personally this is my favorite rendition of this aria), his singing of "Cielo e mar" was just as poetic but much more clarion, especially his high notes, than when he made his debut fourteen seasons earlier:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtnD37DDERw&feature=email

The title role in Gounod's "Faust" entered my father's repertory at the Met in January 1951.  It was not a role that he sang regularly, however; it was eclipsed by his much more numerous appearances in such operas as "Rigoletto," "Cavalleria Rusticana," "La Traviata," "La Boheme" and others in the early 1950’s.  But in concert, and in this case on network television, he occasionally sang the demanding aria "Salut, demure chaste e pure":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8soQhDVNjxU

Although he sang a number of roles in the French repertoire, it was the operas of Verdi, Puccini, Leoncavallo, Giordano and Mascagni that became the mainstays of my father’s long and distinguished career.  One of his favorite Puccini roles was that of Mario Cavaradossi in "Tosca."  When he sang "E lucevan le stelle," he always infused the aria with fiery intensity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bH3XRxSQLQ

The verismo tradition in the Italian repertoire gave my father many of his memorable roles--but he was very prudent about not taking on a particular role until he and his coach felt that his voice was mature enough for weightier operatic parts.  In addition to his coach, my father also relied upon my mother's keen sense of what was right for him as his voice grew in power.

Although she was not a musician, my mother had an unerring ear for my father's singing.  She also knew how he relished new challenges, especially new roles.  But if she sensed he was considering a role that she thought was not appropriate for him, she would merely say very calmly, "It's not for you, Ruby."  Never once did I hear him question her judgment.

The role of Canio in "Pagliacci" was another example of an opera that my father did not add to his repertoire until much later in his career.  When he finally felt ready to sing the role in the opera house, his searing portrayal of the tragic clown became his signature role in the early 1970’s, when the Met unveiled new productions of "Cav" and "Pag" by the renowned theater director and filmmaker Franco Zeffirelli, with Leonard Bernstein conducting.

Although a network-quality video recording of a complete performance of my father singing "Pacliacci" exists, it has never been shown publicly for legal reasons.  Fortunately, however, there are videos of him singing "Vesti la giubba" from a television program in which he performed the aria several years earlier:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj-D82L4wSQ&feature=youtu.be


The date of April 11, 1970 marked the gala celebration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of my father's Metropolitan Opera debut.  For his anniversary, he was given carte blanche to choose whatever he wanted to perform on that historic evening.  He chose specific acts from three operas, in each of which he was paired with a different soprano of his choosing:  the first act of "La Traviata," with Joan Sutherland; the second act of "La Gioconda," with Renata Tebaldi; and the third act of "Aida" with Leontyne Price.  Each act was conducted by three of his favorite maestri:  Richard Bonynge (for "La Traviata"), Kurt Herbert Adler (for "La Gioconda"), and Francesco Molinari-Pradelli (for "Aida").

Alfredo in "La Traviata" was always one of my father's favorite roles.  He sang it at the Met for the last time in September 1967, when he put it aside as he took on heavier roles.  Fortunately for posterity, a video recording exists of an impromptu, playful rendition of the "Libiamo" duet, with my father singing Alfredo to the Violetta of Licia Albanese at the 75th birthday party for the conductor Wilfrid Pelletier, whose encouragement had meant so much to my father decades earlier.  Maestro Pelletier accompanies them at the piano--and the lady in the pink dress standing next to Licia Albanese in the bend of the piano is Sara Tucker, my mother:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXVeSmI5qVY&feature=youtu.be

One of the most memorable events in the twentieth-century history of the Metropolitan Opera was the star-studded gala performance honoring the leadership and legacy of Sir Rudolf Bing when he announced his retirement as general manager.  The gala was televised world-wide, and most every notable Metropolitan artist was featured in the ensembles that Sir Rudolf had selected for his gala.

For one of these selections, my father was paired with his long-time friend Robert Merrill in one of the duets from "La Forza del Destino."  Merrill, by his own admission, was very nervous while he and my father waited in the dressing they shared during the gala.  My ever-confident father, on the contrary, exhorted Merrill to join with him in a rendition that, in his words, "will make the mothers of the rest of these singers forget their names."

When their moment in the gala finally arrived and they were waiting in the wings, my father kept prodding Merrill to give the performance of his life.  To add to his prodding, he grabbed Merrill by the shoulder as they were ready to walk onstage.  "Remember, Merrill, no goddamned bunting tonight!" he barked.  "It's gotta be a home run!  Nothing less!"  The videotape of the dramatic duet, "Le minaccie i fieri accenti," went so spectacularly that my father can actually be seen skipping off the stage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-FOUTf0Ye4&feature=em-share_video_user

While there are several videotaped performances of my father in his various signature roles, that of Des Grieux in Puccini's “Manon Lescaut" was his personal favorite throughout his Metropolitan career.  I can vividly remember the emotion he showed when he described to my mother and my brothers how much Des Grieux meant to him, and how deeply he identified with the music and the character.  When he was invited to perform one of the arias on television, he sang "Guardate! Pazzo Son!" with a vocal and dramatic intensity that can only be described as white hot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHFCORFuYps&feature=email

At the Metropolitan Opera House and on tour, my father not only sang more performances than almost any other leading tenor, but he also helped secure opportunities for younger tenor colleagues like Luciano Pavarotti and Placido Domingo, who were then beginning their Metropolitan careers.  He also became friends with some of his supposed rivals such as Franco Corelli, and earlier Mario del Monaco.

For a career that began in the 1930’s with little more than the unshakable self-confidence my father had, his life ended just as he was in the midst of a new dramatic period in his thirty-year career.  As in-house recordings from the 1970’s confirm, he continued to pour every ounce of himself into every performance he sang.

What he did his best to repress, however, was that he had already had a major heart attack earlier in his career--a diagnosis that he had categorically denied.  But on January 8, 1975, while he was on tour with Robert Merrill in a series of joint concerts, my father had a massive, fatal heart attack.  He was only 61 years old, and was still at the peak of his career.

The day after his sudden passing, my mother and my eldest brother Barry went privately to meet with Schuyler Chapin, who had recently become the Met's new general manager.  They asked for an unprecedented favor from the Met administration:  to be able to hold my father's memorial service on the Metropolitan Opera stage.  Mr. Chapin quickly polled the Met's board of directors, who gave their permission for the memorial service.  Afterward, my father was laid to his rest in the family plot in the Mount Lebanon Cemetery in the New York area.

Soon after the funeral, my mother, my brother Barry, and Herman Krawitz of the Metropolitan administration, formulated tentative plans to create the Richard Tucker Music Foundation in order to perpetuate my father’s legacy and to offer substantial financial grants to promising young singers in the future.  Under the visionary leadership of my brother Barry, the Foundation has now become one of the largest and most prestigious music foundations in the world.  Numerous singers who are now internationally famous can trace the roots of their success to the support they received from the Richard Tucker Music Foundation.

For my part, and I feel confident that I can speak for my brothers on this subject, it seems impossible to envision my father at the age of 100.  I prefer to remember him in the full bloom of his life, when his energy, vitality, and self-confidence permeated everything he undertook.  One of the finest tributes he received was from the late Francis Robinson, who said in a tribute that my father’s voice “had incomparable beauty, sweetness and lyricism coupled with an extraordinary upper register that punished B-flats and B-naturals as they echoed from the parterre boxes of the Old Met.”

Many stellar tenors have been deservedly praised for their artistic contributions to operatic history.  There have been tenors who had incredibly beautiful voices and formidable techniques that enabled them to add impressive ornamentations and embellishments to the music and roles they sang.  But in my personal opinion, none of them could match Richard Tucker for his consistency and longevity in such operas as “La Forza del Destino,” “Pagliacci,” “Manon Lescaut,” “La Gioconda,” "Andrea Chenier," “Un Ballo in Maschera,” and in such memorable scenes as the third act of “La Boheme.”

What I consider the most important attribute of my father’s legacy, and a point that is beyond dispute in my judgment, is that he is the finest Italian tenor that America has ever produced, and will be included in the pantheon of opera singers as one of the greatest tenors ever.

Henry R. Tucker

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Max Lorenz: Germany's Answer to Lauritz Melchior


 

Today I am pleased to offer to readers another guest commentary by Mr. Darren Seacliffe, from Singapore. Darren is an undergraduate student in his early 20's, pursuing a degree in a private university in Singapore. His interest in both opera and operetta spans a wide variety of genres, from Rossini to German operetta to Wagner! I will only add that Mr. Seacliffe's knowledge of opera, especially for one so young, is truly extraordinary!  Today, he presents a detailed analysis and comparative study of two great Heldentenors, Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior, dwelling principally upon German tenor Max Lorenz!.


 

Lauritz Melchior, the Great Dane, is unanimously regarded by most critics and connoisseurs, especially those in the Anglo-American musical circles, to have been the greatest Heldentenor of all time. However, in recent years, the name of another Heldentenor, Max Lorenz, a contemporary of the Great Dane, has been brought up as an alternative candidate for this illustrious title. Like all great men, Max Lorenz remains surrounded by controversy even to this very day. To the Germans, he was the greatest Heldentenor they ever had. To the English and the Americans, he was an  overrated Heldentenor who supposedly only got his big break because Lauritz Melchior had abandoned Germany for the US. .

 With the exceptions of Der Fliegende Hollander and Tannhauser, the musical structures of Wagner’s operas tend sometimes not to be very listener-friendly, and can  demand more concentration and greater mental stamina on the part of the listener. Unlike most Italian and French operas, in which one doesn’t have to wait too long between each musical number, the show stoppers in Wagner’s operas are somewhat dispersed. Italian opera ensembles are usually of manageable length; Wagner’s ensembles are often very long, so that only the greatest cast and best conductor can sustain the listener’s attention through them. These two characteristics account for the formidable nature of Wagner’s operas. Nonetheless, with the right performers, it need not appear that way to interested listeners. Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior were two such performers.

Being the most prominent representatives of 2 starkly contrasting approaches to performing Wagner, Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior can both be described as antipodes to one another.  A Lauritz Melchior Wagner performance is a considerably different listening experience from a Max Lorenz one. A  Melchior performance is like a wandering down a meandering river to  Asgard, the world of the gods in Teutonic  mythology.  With his superhuman stamina and velvety rich voice, Melchior renders each Heldentenor role he sings deceptively lyrical. From start to finish, he is able to deliver lyrics so smoothly and easily that he makes  the ‘killer’ roles of Tristan and Siegfried sound no less difficult than the much more commonly performed roles of Lohengrin and Siegmund. In comparison, a Max Lorenz performance is like a bumpy boat trip to Asgard down a surging river current. Lorenz’s singing may not have been as smooth or as easy on the ear as Lauritz Melchior’s, but I feel that his interpretations of the great Heldentenor roles gave more life to the characters he played than Melchior did. As a creature of the stage, Max Lorenz was more imaginative in his characterization. He was less restrained, more passionate and showed more conviction in his performances. More importantly, as a natural tenor, Max Lorenz seemed to have a higher top which made him sound more powerful and heroic than the baritone-turned-tenor Lauritz Melchior.

With such different approaches in singing Wagner, one might be inclined to think that Max Lorenz and Lauritz Melchior had different singing teachers. The truth, however, was quite different. Both great Heldentenors actually had the same singing teacher, Ernst Grenzebach. As a result, Lorenz was capable of singing passages with almost the same amount of smoothness and ease his fellow student did. Listen to this extract from Lohengrin sung by Max Lorenz with Kate Heidersbach in 1929, and see if you don’t you find his performance uncannily similar to the one by  Melchior.  Lorenz’s singing may not be as poetic as Melchior’s but I feel he sounds slightly more romantic than Melchior in his interpretation of the role.  I find Lorenz’s performance almost as beautiful and as powerful as Melchior’s classic version with Lotte Lehmann. Some  might find this  Lorenz rendition surprisingly different from the one they’ve heard. I think one reason could be the fact he was still using the technique Grenzebach taught him then.


 
After the above performance,  Max Lorenz’s singing technique would begin to deviate from the one Grenzebach had taught him. This was because Max Lorenz always felt that expression was much more important than the beauty of the sound he made. As the man himself once said, ‘I didn’t care much if a tone wasn’t absolutely exquisite. For me, expression was the main thing.’’ To make the dramatic outbursts so typical of his singing, he was sometimes forced to sacrifice single notes and even the musical line. He would drag or chop up the lyrics and/or strain his voice from time to time to make a theatrical statement during his performances. Periodically, he would strain his voice so much, and it became so raw, that some of the notes he produced came out ugly or even ridiculous. On top of that, there were some over-generous helpings of sobbing and declaiming . To the Germans, all these would make his performances sound more powerful and intense than anybody else’s. To the English and the Americans, they made them” hammy.”

While the talent of the great Lauritz Melchior (1890-1973) was discovered relatively early, Max Lorenz (1901-1975) was, in comparison, a late bloomer. Unlike Melchior, who sang in a boys’ choir at an English church, Lorenz at one time got himself thrown out of choir practice for bellowing, roaring and singing off-key. Despite this early setback, however, he never gave up. His deep love of singing made him determined to make a career for himself as an opera singer. Nevertheless, he had to contend with his father’s opposition. Lorenz’s father felt that a musical education was nothing more than a waste of money so Lorenz was forced to take his singing lessons on the sly, with the support and encouragement of his mother. Lorenz initially studied under Prof. Pauli in Cologne. After failing an audition at the Wiesbaden State Opera House, he decided to seek further instruction. In spite of his father’s strong disapproval. However, through the intercession of his mother, Lorenz was able to go to Berlin where he studied under the highly regarded Ernst Grenzebach, who would transform this boy into a master singer.

After going through a rigorous 2-year training regime under the hard taskmaster Grenzebach, in 1926, Max Lorenz was allowed to take part in a singing competition held by a popular magazine, where he won first prize. Shortly after, he was given a contract by Fritz Busch of the Dresden State Opera. During his tenure at the Dresden State Opera, Lorenz initially sang minor roles like Walther von der Vogelweide in Tannhauser. It didn’t take long, however, for Lorenz to get his first big break. After a performance of Richard Strauss’ Salome under the baton of its composer, Strauss was so impressed he offered Lorenz the technically difficult (but unrewarding) role of Menelaus in the opera Die Aegyptische Helena. Lorenz was to obtain his first big success in this role. He continued to prove successful in  singing roles from Richard Strauss’ operas. Some of the roles he sang included Herodes (Salome), Bacchus (Ariadne auf Naxos) and Aeghist (Elektra). It’s a great pity that there are  no recordings of Lorenz’s Menelaus, as far as I know. However, fortunately, Lorenz was captured in his other prime Strauss tenor role, Bacchus, in a 1944 performance of Ariadne staged in celebration of the composer’s 80th birthday. Here is the best part of his performance in this opera, the finale with the legendary soprano Maria Reinin, in the title role:


 In this extract,  Lorenz’s tenor isn’t as raw or ungainly as it was in the rest of this performance or,for that matter, in some other performances during this stage of his career. His singing may not be beautiful in the conventional sense but don’t you feel something when you hear him sing with such passion and fervor? He’s so dramatic I find myself touched by the intensity of his performance. His singing is so powerful that it makes me willing to put up with his throaty voice.

Lorenz’s successful performance in Ariadne auf Naxos took him to the Berlin State Opera and the Vienna State Opera, where his Radames brought him the attention of the Met’s German wing conductor, Artur Bodanzky. Bodanzky would later invite Lorenz to sing at the Met, where he would score his first international success. During Lorenz’s stay at the Met (1931 – 1933), he sang Walther (Die Meistersinger von Nurnberg), Tannhauser, Lohengrin, Siegmund (Die Walkure) and Siegfried . The Americans were especially taken by Lorenz’s youthful Siegfried. His success in America was to earn him an invitation to Bayreuth in 1933, where he would become the finest Heldentenor of his age. (Note: It’s true that by 1933, Lauritz Melchior was no longer performing in Bayreuth. There’s a misconception I heard in some quarters that Max Lorenz only got his chance to perform at Bayreuth because he was the sole Heldentenor in Germany after Melchior’s departure. This is untrue. There were still several other great Heldentenors left in Germany like Set Svanholm, Joachim Sattler and August Seider. Though not as good as Lorenz and Melchior, they were still first-class.)

Besides singing Wagner and Strauss, Max Lorenz was known to make periodic excursions into the non-German operatic repertory. Among his most successful roles in the non-German operatic repertory were the previously-mentioned Radames (Aida), Don Alvaro (La Forza del Destino) and his most famous role after the great Wagner tenor roles, Verdi’s Otello. Lorenz was such a successful Otello that he was repeatedly invited by La Scala to sing the role in Italian there. (Lorenz would ultimately reject La Scala’s invitation because he felt his Italian wasn’t good enough to sing Otello in Italy.) Compare that to Lauritz Melchior, whose repertoire became exclusively limited to Wagner after his move to the Met. It wasn’t that Melchior couldn’t sing the non-German operatic repertoire;before Melchior moved to the Met, he sang a few non-German tenor roles like Otello and Radames in Europe. When he moved to the Met, being a member of its German wing meant that he wasn’t given the chance to sing anything but Wagner there.

 

Unlike  Melchior, who was only able to leave a few selections from Pagliacci, Aida, Otello and L’Africaine as mementoes of his work in the non-German repertoire, Max Lorenz was captured in substantially complete performances of Aida and Un Ballo in Maschera.  Sadly, there aren’t any recordings of his Otello apart from a few excerpts). Here are samples of his work in each of these operas.  First, the young Max Lorenz’s rendition of “Celeste Aida” in German. It is what I would call truly heroic.  He might not be as thrilling as in some his later performances but his vocal display demonstrates considerable power, a portent of  a great dramatic tenor. Notwithstanding his formidable vocal instrument, he was able to scale it down to sound appropriately delicate and tender in the lyrical moments of the aria, a feat few other tenors could replicate:


 
The following excerpt from Un Ballo is most definitely unusual. How often do you hear a fully-fledged Heldentenor attempt a lyric role? At this point, Max Lorenz was already an experienced Siegfried. Though he may sound  throaty here, he absolutely convinces in the tragic role of Riccardo (Gustavus III) with his tearful performance. He sounds as though he’s being torn apart by his love for Hilde Konetzni’s Amelia:


 
Lorenz’s arrival in Bayreuth could not have come at a more opportune time for the opera festival. At that time, Winifred Wagner, the woman in charge of the festival, was trying to re-establish Bayreuth as the premier venue for Wagner performances. Furthermore, the festival’s artistic director, Heinz Tietjen, and its scenic director Emil Pretorius, were trying to stage groundbreaking Wagner performances that were as near to Wagner’s conception as possible. Combining heroic stature and a formidable stage presence, Max Lorenz was the man of the moment, the right man to help them realize these noble aspirations. Heinz Tietjen was to be the man who would bring about the turning point in Max Lorenz’s career. For months, he worked with Lorenz for two to three hours every day, rehearsing every gesture and move with him a hundred times over. Lorenz would become the finest Heldentenor of his age under his mentorship. He was proven to be a success at Bayreuth. With his incredibly expressive voice and his vast reserves of natural energy, Lorenz was the heart and soul of every performance, leaving a lasting impact on his audiences. People thronged to see him and he found himself swamped with wedding proposals. (One American lady was so desperate to marry him that she offered to buy him off his wife for 1 million dollars!)

While Max Lorenz personified the Wagnerian hero in Bayreuth, in the US, Lauritz Melchior was keeping the Wagner dream alive and more importantly, helping the Met stay in business, during the Depression and World War II. Lauritz Melchior’s reputation has survived largely intact into the modern day because of the standard-setting excerpts he recorded in the studios of big recording companies like HMV and RCA Victor, and the considerable number of broadcasts in the Met archives from his heyday. On the other hand, Max Lorenz’s reputation has proven vulnerable to the ravages of time. One reason why his reputation didn’t last as long as Melchior’s did was because until recently, his recordings weren’t as accessible as Melchior’s. Ever since Melchior’s recordings were first released during his lifetime, they have been in circulation. In the case of Max Lorenz’s recordings, as far as I know, they have only been reintroduced to the public not too long ago. Another reason was that while all of Lauritz Melchior’s recordings betray no sign of vocal decline, most of  Lorenz’s complete performances were from the period of his vocal decline, namely the period after 1945. The last reason is because Lorenz has never been well-received by the Anglo-American music critics who continue to hold sway until today, for reasons that I’ve described earlier. Max Lorenz’s greatness was lost on them because they couldn’t understand the words on which he placed so much emphasis in his work.

  Lorenz not only performed the Wagner tenor roles which Lauritz Melchior kept in his active repertoire: Tannhauser, Parsifal, Lohengrin, Tristan, Siegmund and Siegfried, both young and old. He also sang roles which Melchior did not sing such as Walther, Erik (Der Fliegende Hollander) and Rienzi. Tannhauser, Tristan and Siegfried were to become his most famous Wagner tenor roles. (Though Siegmund was a role which Max Lorenz sang relatively often, the Siegmund of choice during his time was Franz Volker, despite Lorenz’s status as Germany’s top Heldentenor.) 
 
Siegfried was the Wagner tenor role which was associated with Max Lorenz during his time at Bayreuth in the 1930s. According to the great Fischer-Dieskau, Lorenz was the only one then who had the immediacy, the fiery temperament and conviction required to play the role. In fact, Lorenz identified so much with the character that he eventually became one with Siegfried when he was singing the role. You can hear it for yourself in these two excerpts I’ve selected.Here is Max Lorenz’s Forging Song, from Siegfried, recorded in 1936, during his prime:

 
And here is his rendition of Siegfried’s Narrative from Gotterdammerung, recorded live under Wilhelm Furtwangler with Ludwig Weber as Hagen. Please bear with the sound. Note that this performance in 1950 was from Lorenz’s twilight years:


I can’t deny that Lauritz Melchior’s version of the Forging Song is easier on the ear and sweeter but is Lorenz’s version more gripping? Though Lorenz may not sound as smooth and easy on the ear as Melchior did, with the fire and poetry he imbues in his performance, his characterization of Siegfried becomes more potent than Melchior’s. If you watch the documentary on Max Lorenz, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQKmK9EUAjc, you will find a small part of the Forging Song in better sound. When you listen to it, you can understand how thrilling his performance could be. Even when Max Lorenz was in his late career, and though his voice had become rawer and drier, in the more tender and more delicate parts of the scene, some poetry still shines through in his singing.

 After the War, Max Lorenz came to be better known for his Tristan than his Siegfried. His Tristan was monumental, not only in vocal terms but also in dramatic terms as well. You can hear it for yourself in this extract taken from a performance of Tristan he recorded when he was at his peak:

 

 
In this performance, I’ll say that Max Lorenz isn’t too far away from the standards Melchior set in the role. This is no small praise considering the fact that Melchior was such a successful Tristan that he has become synonymous with the role.  

It’s incredible how Max Lorenz was able to scale down his loud voice to make his Tristan sound tortured by love. The way he expresses his feelings for his Isolde, Paula Buchner, is so sentimental that one can’t help feeling sorry for this ill-starred pair of lovers. This is truly a first-class rendition of the heartbreaking duet.

 As the finest Heldentenor of his age, Max Lorenz was bound to rub shoulders with the Nazis that ruled Germany during his time in Bayreuth. His athletic physical appearance and his position as the leading Siegfried of his day placed him at the center of a cult in which the Nazis worshipped Wagner as Germany’s greatest composer during a time when the Germans were on a quest to search for heroes that they could look up to. After all, Siegfried was a hero whose name epitomized the powerful and insistent hopes of a vulnerable German people recovering from the debacle of the First World War. (‘Sieg’ and ‘Frieder’, the 2 German words that make up Siegfried’s name mean ‘Victory’ and ‘Peace’ respectively.) The way Lorenz utilized his position made him more than a great singer. It made him a singer greater than most as a person.

 Despite being the Third Reich’s star tenor, Max Lorenz’s life under the Nazi regime was no bed of roses. As a prominent homosexual, Lorenz was in a truly precarious situation. For a short while, he was banned permanently from the German stage after the Nazi authorities caught him in an affair with an assistant conductor.  It was only through Winifred Wagner’s intercession with Hitler that he was able to resume his career. If that wasn’t dangerous enough, Max Lorenz was also married to a Jew, Charlotte Appel. Although he was already in great personal danger, he adamantly refused to divorce his wife, even when the Holocaust was in full swing. Lorenz even insisted that his wife be given her share of the meager privileges to be had during World War II. Things eventually came to a head when the SS came to Lorenz’s house to take his wife and his mother-in-law away. Lorenz’s wife and his mother-in-law were only able to emerge from the experience unscathed when his wife asked Hermann Goering’s sister to intervene in the matter. After the visit, Max Lorenz was able to obtain Goering’s personal protection for his wife and mother-in-law. Besides saving them, Lorenz also used his unique position to hide several colleagues and friends and help them leave Germany. It was true that things could have been much easier for Lorenz if he fled Germany, but being a man who was closely connected to his home and fatherland; it was something he could not do. Moreover, the Nazis didn’t allow him to take his wife abroad.

 For me, as good as Lorenz’s Siegfried and/or Tristan may be, the role which I’ll always associate with Max Lorenz will be his Tannhauser. It was his Tannhauser that kindled an interest in Wagner in me which not even the great Melchior could arouse. Allow me to present the coup de grace from this performance:


 
This excerpt is the best sample of Max Lorenz’s work to show how expressive his singing could be. In hindsight, it’s true that Max Lorenz’s rendition of the Rome Narrative from Wagner’s Tannhauser isn’t conventionally beautiful. Even so, you can’t deny how dramatic it is. I believe that the impassioned nature of his artistry can be traced to his personality. Though always good for a joke in company, Lorenz, in private, like Franco Corelli and several other great singers, was a man plagued by insecurities. He felt the stage compensated for his innate shyness. If you take this into account, I feel one can understand why his performances have such an impact on me. A man afflicted with doubt who drew on the stage for support is an artist well capable of making a character’s last tormented moments sound sickeningly realistic. The stage is the means for him to channel his negative feelings. Here, I’m sure Max Lorenz made full use of that.

 After the War,  Lorenz moved to Vienna, where he became the leading Heldentenor of the Vienna Opera House. Here, he specialized in the roles Tannhauser, Tristan and Verdi’s Otello. He would also spend more time than ever on tour. He began appearing at the Salzburg Festival, where he participated in the performances of several modern works. Many major opera houses around the world invited him for guest performances, where he made a resurgent comeback. Some examples of his more famous guest performances would include the Gotterdammerung he sang at La Scala as part of Furtwangler’s ring cycle, a Tristan he sang there under de Sabata with the great Gertrud Grob-Prandl and a Walkure he sang at the Met with the renowned baritone Joel Berglund. (Note that recordings of these 3 performances exist, though with variable sound quality.) Despite these international successes, it was soon time for Max Lorenz to wind down his hitherto flourishing career.

 By the early 50s, Lorenz’s voice was beginning to show signs of wear and tear. It was only natural after two decades of heavy duty work singing Wagner’s dramatic tenor roles. (Lauritz Melchior, on the contrary, proved immune to the toll of time but his case is more an exception than the norm.) Although Max Lorenz was coming into a phase of vocal decline, he continued to be a first choice singer when it came to casting the operas of Richard Strauss and other modern works. During this stage of his career, instead of playing lead roles in these operas, he would play character roles. An example would be the Drum Major in Berg’s Wozzeck. Nevertheless, there were times when he was still asked to play main roles. He was asked to play the main roles of Josef K. and the Podesta in the operas Der Prozess and Penelope by the composers Gottfried von Einem and Rolf Liebermann respectively. Another new role which he also added to his repertoire was the title role in Pfitzner’s Palestrina.

 Despite  Lorenz’s attempts to expand his repertoire, the curtain was soon to fall on his illustrious career. A new era ushered in a new management regime in the Vienna State Opera House, like all opera houses worldwide. In 1955, Max Lorenz was discharged by the incoming Intendant, Herbert von Karajan, the same way his senior Lauritz Melchior was laid off by the Met’s new General Manager, Rudolf Bing, several years earlier. Lorenz would switch to the Vienna Volksoper where he sang operetta or musical roles like Buffalo Bill, in Annie Get Your Gun (in German, obviously). Nevertheless, from time to time, he would occasionally perform lead roles in various opera houses. Max Lorenz would give his farewell performance in 1962 as Herod in Salome at the Vienna State Opera. It was an ignominious occasion. According to the tenor Waldemar Kmentt, no one from the management came to give him a proper send-off. There were no flowers or anything else for that matter. This in my opinion was a downright shameful way to send off a legendary tenor who had given so much to German musical life during his best years. On Lorenz’s side, when it dawned on him that his singing career was over, he became utterly inconsolable. Legend has it that he was so sad that he was unable to take curtain calls for saying goodbye to his beloved audience, forcing him to leave via a side entrance.

The end of Max Lorenz’s singing career was not the only blow to come to the great singer. Another blow would come when he lost his wife in 1964. It was a blow from which he would never recover. After his retirement, Lorenz was to become a mentor to young singers like Jess Thomas, Jean Cox and most importantly, the great American Heldentenor, James King, with whom he went through all the major Wagner tenor roles and to whom he was closest. He also received visits from former colleagues from time to time. Even so, Lorenz became a very lonely person. Time was certainly not kind to him. Once he had been the No. 1 Heldentenor in Germany, now he was reduced to being a nonentity. His reputation has barely recovered since. If that was not bad enough, he would even find himself classified as something he had never been: a Nazi singer. The misclassification unfortunately remains to this very day in some circles. Only Death would release Max Lorenz from all his woes,on 11 Jan 1975.

To end, if you’re in the mood for adventure or something extreme, please allow me to present to you a sample of Lorenz’s work in modern operas from the final stage of his eminent career. We have a short duet from Berg’s Wozzeck with Christel Goltz. Here, Max Lorenz plays the role of the boorish Drum Major. Doesn’t his raw and dry voice suit the pungent music? He makes his voice so harsh that he sounds as crude as his character here.


 

 

Thursday, July 11, 2013

James A. Drake On Rosa Ponselle!

I am both honored and pleased to be able to present Dr. James A. Drake, the world's recognized authority on Rosa Ponselle, as our guest author today.  A recently retired college president, James A. Drake is the author of seven books, four of which are biographies of great opera singers of the twentieth century.  Although not a musician (he earned a doctorate in philosophy and taught primarily in social-science disciplines before he became a university administrator), Dr. Drake earned the confidence of the legendary soprano Rosa Ponselle, with whom he collaborated on her autobiography for Doubleday and Company.

With a foreword by Luciano Pavarotti, the Ponselle-Drake collaboration yielded excellent reviews and was named "Music Book of the Month" by the National Book Clubs of America in 1982.  The book was also promoted during a Metropolitan Opera broadcast in the 1982-83 season.

By that time, Dr. Drake had been selected by Sara Tucker, widow of the celebrated tenor Richard Tucker, to write an authorized biography of the great singer, who had died in 1975 while at the peak of his career.  For the Tucker book, Luciano Pavarotti again contributed a foreword, and the biography was officially released at a special event hosted by maestro James Levine at Lincoln Center.  Once again, Dr. Drake's newest work received a "Music Book of the Month" award.

As the centennial of Rosa Ponselle's birth approached in 1997, Dr. Drake returned to his first biographical subject and wrote an entirely new book, "Rosa Ponselle:  A Centenary Biography," published by Amadeus Press.  Using a postmodern approach in the book's narrative structure, Dr. Drake utilized in near-verbatim form the intensive interviews he had conducted with Ponselle and her family members, managers, fellow artists and friends.  The resulting biography is generally considered the most authoritative book about the soprano who was described by a critic as "a Caruso in pettiticoats."


The setting was a Mediterranean-style estate called Villa Pace, in the rolling hills of Maryland's Green Spring Valley.  The date was January 22, 1977.  The occasion was the 80th birthday of Rosa Ponselle, whom Luciano Pavarotti had described to the media earlier that day as "the Queen of Queens in all of singing."  Seated in her favorite chair near the fireplace in Villa Pace's walnut-paneled library was the diva herself.  "I never used to mind birthdays that had a zero on the end," Ponselle told a CBS interviewer who was covering the event, "but I don't know what to think about one that has an eight in front of it.  What's happened to me?  I can't believe I'm this old now."

As the writer whom Rosa Ponselle had selected to be her biographer, I was privileged to be at Villa Pace that memorable evening.  As the birthday celebration continued through the late-night hours, one of Ponselle's long-time friends, Hugh Johns, said to me, "I really regret, Jim, that you never heard Rosa sing.  I heard her in the 1950's, and she was amazing!"  After a polite pause, George MacManus, a retired New York cosmetics-industry executive, said to Hugh Johns, "Well, you should have heard Rosa when I met her in the 1940's.  But you're too young, so you couldn't have known her and heard her like I did."  At that point another guest spoke up and said, "Well, I first heard Rosa in 1936, when she was still singing at the Met then, so I heard her before both of you did."

After yet another guest made it clear that he had heard Ponselle in the late 1920s--and as the diva was following this one-upmanship banter attentively--Edith Prilik, a petite elderly woman who had been Ponselle's secretary and confidant throughout her career, rose from her chair and announced, "I first heard Rosa in 1915, and none of the rest of you know what the hell you're talking about."

Today, more than thirty years after Rosa Ponselle passed away in 1981, we run the risk that Edith Prilik bluntly underscored: we cannot know with any certainty what Ponselle's voice was like in its prime.  All we have as the basis of any judgment-making are her recordings, most of which she herself did not particularly like.  "Whenever somebody plays [one] of my early records for me," Ponselle said in a 1973 interview, "I sound like I'm singing inside a box.  I keep waiting for somebody to lift the lid and let me out."

One of the very few of her early commercial recordings which she would consent to listen to later in life was an acoustical disc she had recorded in February 1923 for the Columbia Graphophone Company.  The aria is "Selva opace" from Rossini's William Tell, which the Met had revived for the tenor Giovanni Martinelli at the time.  Ponselle regarded this as the best of her earliest recordings:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPdXHRFHwLY

However inadequately the primitive recording technology of that era may have captured Ponselle's large and opulent voice, all of New York's music critics were uniform in their praise for her stunningly mature singing--all the more remarkable considering that Ponselle was only twenty-one when she made her Metropolitan debut, had only seen two operas in her life, and had never performed more than twenty minutes at a time on any stage.  Her pre-Metropolitan career, which spanned but three years, had been spent in vaudeville with her older sister Carmela, where the two were billed on the prestigious Keith Circuit as "The Ponzillo Sisters," their family's surname.

Among the several duets that their vaudeville act comprised (all of which Rosa musically arranged) was the familiar "O sole mio," which Rosa and Carmela recorded for the Columbia company in September 1921.  In the studio recording, as on the Keith Circuit stages, Rosa sang the first verse and the refrain, after which Carmela sang the second verse and then Rosa began the refrain.  Despite the technological limitations of the recording process at that time, the uncanny resemblance between the sisters' voices is quite audible:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsZSgpKQpfQ



 
 
Although Carmela Ponselle eventually had a reasonably successful career as a mezzo-soprano on recordings, on radio and at the Metropolitan (where she made her debut as Amneris in Aida in December 1925), it was Rosa who became an operatic superstar.  In the succession of new and demanding roles she assumed at the Metropolitan (twenty-three roles in total, of which she was typically given two major roles to prepare each season), Elvira in Verdi's Ernani became especially identified with her early in her career.  Although the Met had revived the opera mainly for the tenor Giovanni Martinelli, it was Ponselle's singing of 'Ernani, involami" which proved to be the most popular of the revival.  She recorded the aria for the Victor Talking Machine Company (later RCA Victor) in January, 1928.
 
 
Through the late 1920s and early 1930s, Ponselle remained one of the top-drawing artists on the Met roster, and was able to expand the scope of her popularity through nationwide radio broadcasts.  At that time, the major radio networks regularly tested their audio reception by making test recordings, or "air-checks" of their broadcasts.  Although only six of the soprano's Metropolitan Opera performances were preserved as air-checks (including four performances of Carmen, one Traviata and a fragmentary, barely audible broadcast of Don Giovanni, a significant number of Ponselle's radio appearances were preserved in air-check form.
 
These off-the-air recordings, in Ponselle's estimation, were superior to the commercial recordings that she made during her Metropolitan career.  "My radio broadcasts not only captured more of my voice, she explained, "but they also gave me the freedom to sing an aria at a more relaxed tempo than in my Columbia or RCA recordings."  Among her personal favorites was an air-check from her "Chesterfield Hour" performance of "Tu che invoco con orrore" from Spontini's La Vestale," in which she had sung the title role at its Metropolitan Opera premiere in November, 1925.  Announcer Milton Cross, who was the voice of the Met's Saturday afternoon broadcasts for decades, provided the brief introduction to the aria:
 
 
The "long, gravely sculptured melodies" of La Vestale (as one critic wrote at the time) proved to be a stepping stone to Ponselle's assumption of the title role in Bellini's Norma, which had not been heard at the Met since 1890.  Regrettably, no air-checks of Ponselle singing the demanding 'Casta diva" are known to exist, and her commercial recordings of the aria for the Columbia and Victor labels were among her least favorite discs.  On the stage, she said, "I always sang the second verse twice as slow and half as loud as the first verse, but [the recording engineers] told me that you would hardly hear the tone, it would be too soft, and the tempo would be too slow to do justice to the "Casta diva."  Nonetheless, her Victor recording, which dates from December, 1928, gives us some idea of Ponselle's interpretation of the aria and its recitative:
 
 
In Norma Ponselle reached the apex of her career--although her eroding self-confidence in her upper register led her to transpose any passages with high Cs to a lower and more congenial key.  But despite the critical acclaim she received as Norma, Ponselle wanted to put aside classical roles in favor of ones that involved 'real flesh-and-blood women,' as she put it, in a role like Violetta in Traviata, which she sang to substantial acclaim at Covent Garden but in which she received mixed reviews from the New York critics.  Even some of her colleagues questioned her judgment when trying to adapt such a large, dark, dramatic voice to the role of the frail Violetta.  As her first Alfredo in that opera, the fiery tenor Giacomo Lauri-Volpi later wrote, "her mad assumption of the role of Violetta in effect strangled the mythical Giulia in Vestale."
 
If Ponselle's conception of Violetta earned mixed reviews, her portrayal of Bizet's Carmen netted a much harsher verdict from most of the New York critics.  "It is altogether likely that the music of Carmen lies badly for [her] voice," wrote Pitts Sanborn in the New York Herald, while his counterpart Olin Downes, in The New York Times, declared flatly, "We have never heard Miss Ponselle sing so badly, and we have seldom seen the part enacted in such an artificial and generally unconvincing manner."  Because Ponselle was then turning her attention to a film career, she relocated to Hollywood and made screen tests for the Paramount and MGM studies.  The MGM test, which George Cukor directed in October, 1936, has survived.  In 1979, when I interviewed Cukor, he maintained that Ponselle would have made a viable on-screen Carmen in the context of that era's movie musicals:
 
 
Rosa Ponselle never officially "retired" from the Metropolitan Opera, but rather let her career slip away.  After she indulged in Hollywood society for a time, she moved to Baltimore, the home of her first and only husband, who was son of that city's mayor and was ten years younger than Ponselle.  Together, they planned the design and construction of their marital home, which she named 'Villa Pace," but eventually their marriage failed.  By then Ponselle was no longer singing in public--which she blamed chiefly on the Met's general manager, former tenor Edward Johnson, for refusing to revive Adriana Lecouvreur for her.  Afterward, she dismissed any overtures from the Metropolitan and described herself to Johnson a  "no come-back girl."  A more likely reflection of her state of mind at the time was a conversation she had with her colleague Grace Moore, who recalled Ponselle saying to her, "I am 39 years old and have never had any fun...so I think I had better start now before it is too late."
 
Some fifteen years later, living alone at Villa Pace in the aftermath of her divorce, Ponselle found refuge in the Baltimore Civic Opera Company, which she transformed from a shoestring operation into an impressive regional company with a roster of up-and-coming stars that included Beverly Sills and Eileen Farrell in the 1950's, and later James Morris, Placido Domingo and Sherrill Milnes, among others.
 
As a coach and voice teacher, Ponselle flourished when working with natural talents like Farrell, but she had reservations about the young Sills ("I never thought she would have the career she's had," Ponselle told me in 1977) and had little to offer Milnes, as he told me candidly.  "Rosa's approach was basically to have us watch her sing a phrase, and then do it just the way she did it." Milnes explained.  "But I'm more of a vocal 'mechanic,' and I do best when I'm told to elevate the soft palate, for example--but she didn't teach that way.  It was just 'Watch me, and do as I do.'"
 
Nonetheless, as Milnes attested to me, and as Sills wrote in her first book, Ponselle's voice was still largely intact when they were studying with her.  In the autumn of 1954, fifteen years into her self-imposed retirement, RCA Victor momentarily lured her out of retirement to record any songs and arias of her choice.  RCA even accommodated Ponselle's refusal to travel to New York City for the recording session, and instead transformed part of Villa Pace into a makeshift recording studio.  To promote the resulting album, RCA arranged for a then popular radio host, Ruby Mercer, to interview Ponselle and play selections from the album during one of Mercer's programs.  This is an excerpt from that program, in which Ponselle speaks of and then sings a touching rendition of 'Homing" by Teresa del Riego
 
 
Rosa Ponselle would continue to sing for her "private amusement," as she described it, until a debilitating stroke in 1979 left her partially paralyzed and unable to speak articulately.  A year earlier, during one of my last interviews with her at Villa Pace, I had the privilege of observing her while I played a recording she had made in 1926.  She listened intently and seemed pleased to hear her youthful voice again.  Afterward, she leaned back in her chair and said simply, "I was a freak--a freak of nature."  She was then 81.  Three years later, she was laid to rest next to her sister Carmela, among the hills and woods that surround Villa Pace.
 
                                                                                                            JAMES A. DRAKE
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reply
Forward

Friday, June 28, 2013

The Great Marcella Sembrich


Marcella Sembrich  (1858 – 1935) was the stage name of the Polish coloratura soprano, Prakseda Marcelina KochaÅ„ska. She was born  in Wisniewczyk, then part of Austria, and now part of Ukraine. She first studied violin and piano with her father, and later she entered the Lemberg Conservatory and studied piano with her future husband Wilhelm Stengel . She was able to enter the Vienna Conservatory in 1875. It was soon discovered that her voice was exceptional, and she dedicated herself exclusively to voice from then on.  She made her operatic debut at the relatively tender age of 19 in Athens, as Elvira in I Puritani, in 1877.  She was engaged shortly thereafter by the Vienna Opera, but due to pregnancy she broke the contract. Later, after the birth of her first son, she had to wait for another opportunity and was finally hired as a guest artist at the Dresden Royal Opera House in September, 1878, as Lucia. Her success was immediate and she was dubbed the "Polish Patti." She remained in Dresden for two years, but decided to act boldly—in order to make up for lost time—and broke her Dresden contract and began concertizing on her own, in order to raise money.  She managed to get to London, and after a successful audition was accepted at Covent Garden, where she was quick to sign a contract with them. She created quite a sensation in her 1880 debut there in Lucia.

 Emboldened by her success, she broke her London contract two years early and came to the United States in 1883 to make her Met debut, also as Lucia.  From there it was on to St. Petersburg, and eventually back to the Met in 1898, where she finally settled.  She remained there until 1909, having given over 400 performances.  She concertized for years, finally retiring after WWI.  From then on, she dedicated herself to teaching, in important conservatories.  She was very successful as a teacher, and had significant influence. Among her students were the great Alma Gluck, Hulda Lashanska,  a successful concert singer, coloratura soprano (and novelist!) Queena Mario, and dramatic soprano Dusolina Giannini, who had a very successful international career.  Also among her students was radio vocalist and concertizer Conrad Thibault, who studied with her at Curtis, and who told the distinguished musical biographer James A. Drake,  in an interview in 1976, that “she was always very attentive and generous to her students, and talked to them personally about the [singing teachers Francesco and Giovanni Lamperti ] and their methods.”  Drake goes on to say, interestingly, that  “He (Thibault) added that at least in his experience with her, she never demonstrated vocalises or otherwise sang even so much as a single tone.”  *    She was also a fundraiser for Polish causes, following WWI. 

Since Lucia played so large a part in her earlier career, serving as a frequent debut opera, it seems appropriate to begin there.  I apologize for the scratchiness of the recording.  I cannot find a better recording than the one I posted some years ago, and I was not able to clean up the scratching on the transfer without taking some quality from the voice.  Here is the 1906 recording of “Ardon gl’incensi”: 

What most impresses me about this singing is the clarity, purity, precise intonation, and general absence of affectation, either stylistic or vocal. It is, as a result, what can honestly be classified as elegant singing, not always the case with divas of the era.  She was often compared to Patti, especially in her youth, and one can see why:  We note the same  clarity and purity of the voice, including the  floating, haunting tones. Like Patti, Sembrich  sings perfectly on the breath, which is how she is able to  portamento up and down so smoothly and seamlessly, and also trill easily. There is considerable vocal fluidity to be noted in the singing of both these great divas from the distant past.
Another favorite opera for Sembrich was I Puritani.  Here is the lovely “Qui la Voce sua Soave” from 1907:

Lovely!  This is really very accomplished singing for the period.  At the beginning of the aria, the same “straight,” restrained and haunting melodic line is apparent.  One can notice a slight development of weight in the lower register, compared to the Lucia recording of the previous year, but it is slight and still well integrated with the rather remarkable top register.  Later in the aria, the great flexibility so characteristic of her voice is on display:  the rapid and well executed cadenzas, with a brilliant, in-line C sharp inserted, stand out for their precision.  It was common during this time for sopranos to attempt cadenzas they could not really articulate at speed, with the result that they were in effect glissandi, often musically inappropriate.  Not the case here, as it was not the case with Patti.   Sembrich’s intonation and articulation are both precise, and this is most admirable.

Finally, a 1912 recording of a song from Leo Fall’s 1907 Musical Comedy Die Dollarprinzessin (“The Dollar Princess”):

Sembrich was 54 years when this was recorded.  What we finally have here is a wonderful recording, first of all because the recording itself, as an artifact, has been cleaned up to such a degree that it gives us a very real look at her singing!  The digital transfer was done by my friend Doug at Curzon Road, one of the best classical music sites on the web.  He is extremely skilled at creating audio files from old recordings, and this is so important.  I feel I can very nearly hear the voice of this singer from long ago with a clarity resembling what one might hear in the opera house.  Several things become apparent; first, the purity of intonation and articulation of which we have spoken is not an aural illusion from faded 107-year-old records!  It is very real, and absolutely characteristic of the voice and training.  Second, the vocal registers remain superbly well integrated; there are no “register scoops” and there is no inappropriate “huskiness” in the lower register at all.  The purity of the high soprano voice remains spotless even at age 54.  This is a diva who deserves her reputation!  A fine, elegant, articulate, vocally and stylistically immaculate first lady of the lyric stage!
_____________
*  My thanks to Mr. Drake for sharing this information on Sembrich's teaching with me!

 

 

Friday, June 14, 2013

Jackie Evancho: The Phenomenon


Jackie Evancho:  The Phenomenon
 
 

 

I had to think long and hard to decide how such an article as this, on a 13 year old child, could be framed.  The problem is knottier than I had imagined.  Jackie is a child—a talented one, to be sure, but a girl. She is extremely famous, and almost unbelievably successful.  Does that make her fair game for reviewing?  Some writers and critics have begun to review her work, and I find that to be inappropriate.  I could not and would not do such a thing myself.  I rejoice In her fame and fortune, but I strongly feel she should be left alone to be a little girl  a while longer.  Her day will come.  It’s not even clear what path she will  follow.  Opera?  I doubt it, personally, but I could be wrong.  Theater?  Broadway?  Pop? She just did her first movie, with Robert Redford.  Will she be an actress?  Do you see the problem?  What, exactly, is one reviewing?  I say let’s let her be a little girl while she can!  Later.  Later.

 

I first heard of Jackie in 2009, when her mother wrote to me and sent me a recording of Jackie, then age 9, singing “O Mio Babbino Caro.”  I get a lot of mail of this kind, and I always take it seriously and give it my close attention.  It was immediately apparent that this was an extraordinary voice for a then 9-year old girl.  I remember telling Mrs. Evancho that I was most impressed with the voice, but I doubted the wisdom of letting Jackie sing high Bb’s.  A nine-year-old voice is a VERY delicate thing. Pre-pubertal girls and boys have to be treated with the greatest imaginable care.  I also said that unless my ears deceived me, or unless puberty played a game on us, we were looking at a potential contralto or mezzo here one day.  I recommended the aria be transposed a third down.  I’m happy to say that when Jackie appeared on “America’s Got Talent,” she did sing this aria down a third (minor third, if I recall), and the rest, as they say, is history.  The sound this produced was phenomenal, and it’s that phenomenon, that sound I wish to direct myself to, in a purely analytical way, simply to see if I can touch on something meaningful.  I would only add that I was most impressed with Mrs. Evancho, a careful, caring mother, who explored all the reasonable means at her disposal to get Jackie heard.  She wrote to many people, I was only one of many, and gathered advice.  A careful, sensible procedure.  Jackie was, and remains, in good hands!

 Most of you may have heard it, but the Jackie story really begins with her “America’s Got Talent”  appearance.  Here is a video, viewed by over sixteen million people, of that magic moment:

 

Piers Morgan’s comment, after the aria, “Are you sure you’re not 30,” pretty much sums it up!  That is, of course, what it’s all about.  There is a certain amount of cognitive dissonance here.  That teeny, beautiful, 10 year old creature opens her mouth and out comes a near contralto sound.  And this to an audience who had no idea what was coming.  This “Jackie” sound is a result of having developed, early on, what in the voice training business is called a “cupola,”  which is to say a large “hood” in the mouth which results from what is basically a big yawn, creating a kind of echo chamber—an imprecise term, but I’m sure you see the effect I am describing.  It is the quintessential operatic sound.  It is the opposite of that which is open and piercing.  It could also be called “cover,” which in an adult voice is the result of a lowered larynx.  In adults, we are used to it.  Not in 10 year old little girls.  That, simple as it is, is a huge part of the Jackie vocal phenomenon at that age.  It was the ultimate attention-getter.  (And, not coincidentally, one of the benefits of singing in Italian!)

 Let’s change a few factors:  a little more age, go to English, raise the tessitura just a bit:


 
Very winning!  That doesn’t change.  Suddenly not very operatic, however.  The cover has been lifted slightly—English will do that!  The voice is, correspondingly, “whiter.”  No problem at all, but a slightly different category starts to come to mind (and ear):  “cross-over.”  And this is, in fact, a word used often when describing much of Jackie’s singing.

We need to hear Jackie today.  This is a fairly recent video, and it shows what may—repeat may—be a sign of things to come.  This video is five minutes long, and you may not wish to hear it all, but a couple of minutes will speak adequately to what we are trying to evaluate here, and that is simply a description of the phenomenon:

 
This is pretty straight-forward pop, with a slight cross-over quality on top.  :  whiter voice, much less covered, but remarkably pure.  That is perhaps  the most remarkable thing about Jackie’s voice:  from the beginning, there has not been a single hint of harshness, shrillness, edginess, or faulty intonation.  This makes the matter of the seeming “contralto” sound of age 10 irrelevant.  What we have, consistently, over the period of 3 years, is amazing purity of intonation and quality!  Where the voice will go is not for me to say.  On a guess, I’d say crossover/pop.  If this were the 1930’s, I’d say movie singer.  Whether today’s movie market—I’m thinking of Chloe Moretz in Kickass and Jennifer Lawrence in Winter’s Bone, inter alia-- will support Deanna Durbin-like singing children is anybody’s guess!  There are trailers on Youtube of “The Company You Keep,” in which Jackie has a part.  The movie is pretty grim.  Jackie’s part is small but important, and she does a good job. Redford was impressed with her.

There are of course other factors in the Jackie phenomenon.  One of the most important is that she is extremely beautiful.  NOT an inconsiderable factor!  Also, she is obviously a very nice kid, being very well raised by her parents.  This shines through in everything she does.  All this makes one mightly little package!  Let’s wish her very well.  She has some tough years to navigate, but given how well she’s handled the last three, and how well her parents have done keeping her centered, my instincts tell me she’ll do just fine! 

_________________________________
Comments on this particular article can only be accepted if they are written in the spirit of the article itself, which is to say celebratory, not critical.   This is not a review; I will never review the work of children who are currently performing.  Edmund StAustell