[Before I can even begin to tell
the story of Jozef Sterkens, I need, first and foremost, to publicly thank
Pierre at Jozefsterkens2.com. for his absolutely indispensable assistance. Pierre 's site is one of the oldest and most
respected on Youtube, and he is certainly the foremost authority on Jozef
Sterkens, after whom he has named his site. I owe to him the videos and
the biography which I have used in the preparation of this article.
Secondly, it is important to point out that Jozef Sterkens' life consists
of two distinct parts: artistry and politics, and the two influenced each
other. He was a leading figure of the
Flemish artistic renaissance in Flanders, during the very stressful period of WWII. I can only deal here with the artistic life. Edmund St.Austell]
Jozef Sterkens (pseudonym of Jozef Steuren) was born in
Antwerp in 1893. His parents had a
laundry in Antwerp, and hoped that young Jozef could study to become a teacher.
He was a good scholar, and so they arranged—although their funds were
limited—to send him to the Normal School
in Ghent, in 1908. Bright boy though he was, he failed to develop much interest
in his studies, generally speaking, but he did have the chance to take music
lessons from the Flemish composer Emiel Hullebroeck, who soon discovered that
young Jozef had a beautiful tenor voice. Hullebroeck strongly recommended
singing lessons, but family finances made it impossible for Jozef to do
anything but become an art teacher after graduation. Within a few years, WWI
broke out, and Jozef joined the armed forces, where he spent the next four
years working as a nurse in a military hospital. While in the army, he had the opportunity,
along with other artists, to sing for soldiers at the front. His patriotic diligence and hard work led to
his being decorated on four different occasions.
After the Armistice, Sterkens returned to Antwerp and
resumed his teaching career, while also studying at the Royal Flemish
Conservatory. In 1923, he sang for the music critic of a local newspaper, who
in turn introduced him to Edmond Borgers, the leading heldentenor of the Royal
Flemish Opera. After hearing Sterkens
sing "In Fernem Land," he
offered to give him singing lessons. In
that same year, Sterken's career began, in a modernistic vein that would
characterize much of his later work. His
first concerts consisted of works by Flemish composers Peter Benoit, Jan
Blockx, Jef Van Hoof, and Renaat Veremans,
and were presented to largely Flemish-speaking audiences.
One of the main reasons many opera lovers, especially in
this country, do not know much about Sterkens' career now is that from the very beginning he
became strongly associated with presenting Flemish music, and music in
Flemish. There were two opera houses in
Antwerp: The Royal French Opera and the
Royal Flemish Opera. The French Opera
dedicated itself largely to French and Italian works, and the Flemish house to
German works, and works in Flemish translation.
Because of Sterken's association with the Flemish house, he did not have
much opportunity to sing the French and
Italian repertoire that held so many great roles for tenors. There were strong
political pressures for him to adhere to Flemish. At this time, Flanders, the Dutch-speaking
part of Belgium, was completely dominated by French speakers and French
culture, and the need was greatly felt, by the Flemish, to establish Flemish
art and culture in Flanders. Sterkens
was, in fact, to become an important figure in that Flemish struggle for
cultural liberation.
He joined the Royal Flemish Opera in 1925, and his first big
success was Tamino, in 1927. He quickly
became the leading lyric tenor in the company. The following year he sang the St. Matthew
Passion in Paris, under the baton of the famous Flemish conductor Lodewijk de
Vocht, and made his first recordings for the French Gramophone Company. He was
also becoming a fixture on Belgian radio.
In 1929 he sang Florestan opposite the Leonore of Lotte Lehmann, who was
a frequent performer at the Royal Flemish Opera. During this period, he took part in
presenting the Dutch versions of Sadko (1925), Paganini (1927), Jenufa (1927),
Sly (1929), Die tote Stadt (1932), and Daphne (1939)
Sterkens' story from this point until his death in 1952 is
primarily a story of administrative work, both at the Royal Flemish and
elsewhere. Unfortunately, it is a sad
one, full of the political intrigues and politics of the time. He was even jailed at one point, after the
liberation of Antwerp in 1944, for a period of about 8 months. After that, he fell into obscurity for a long
time, but slowly began to regain his reputation. Just at the moment when he was to be given a
significant post as chairman of the Musical Copyright Society, he died of a
heart attack. The year was 1952. It's a
rather depressing story, really. Those interested in reading of these matters
in more detail can consult 401 Divas, http://401dutchdivas.nl/en/belgian-singers/440-jozef-sterkens.html I am indebted to this site for my
biographical information.
I think it is important to first hear Sterkens in one of the
most lyrical and beautiful renditions I know of
the aria "Glück das mir verlieb," from Korngold's Die tote
Stadt:
Now isn't that just absolutely beautiful! I certainly think it is! What kind of voice is it, essentially? I think of Sterken's voice as being in the
Gigli/ Tagliavini/ Schipa fach, which is to say high lyric tenor, but with a
decidedly German/Dutch color. If you
associate colors with vocal sounds, this might be called
"brown," as compared to the
darker, "black" quality of the typical Italian voice—or at least that
of Gigli, perhaps not so much that of Tagliavini. Of one thing there can be no question: this is a very beautiful voice, absolutely
without strain or harsh edge, a superb lyric tenor.
Next, we can hear in Sterken's voice the introduction of
drama, of a dark and mysterious kind, in Respighi's Campana Sommersa, a mythical opera concerning a sunken bell
between two worlds, the world of humans and that of fairies. Choices have to be made, and tragic
consequences may hang on the quality of the choice. It is basically a verismo fairy-tale with
dark forebodings:
The voice, while lyric, has here acquired some edginess; it
is also more dramatic, with greater dynamic variations. Clearly, the potential for development into a
slightly darker voice is there, but it
was never pushed. It was always the
lyric and the beautiful that dominated Sterken's singing.
Finally, to illustrate that point even more, here is a real
rarity, the only known film footage of Sterkens. It is from a silly, light-hearted comedy of
the kind that proliferated during the 1930's.
Here is the Dutch song "Elisa," from the movie "De Witte:
Notice the voix mixte high C sharp at the end? A famous voice teacher once told me that opera
voices would be better and longer-lived if singers and conductors ever figured
out that most people far prefer what is pretty to what is simply loud!. Case in point! I cannot help but wonder what Sterkens' fate
would have been if he had been born in Italy or France, in years of relative
peace, and had had the opportunity to sing extensively in the standard Latin
repertoire of those countries. I believe
I would be telling an entirely different story.
13 comments:
Thank you again for an excellent article on a man we hardly know. I like your comparison to Gigli et al. But I still think I hear shades of Tauber in his voice in the video clip. I am always tickled by the videos in which a person sings arias and suddenly all the people around are suddenly inspired to listen and gather. Yes, "what if?" How many "what ifs" are there in artists who died too young? At any rate, thanks again.
Thank you, Mr. Hobbes, for your comment, which I appreciate. I understand what you mean. I would only suggest that perhaps it was not so much a question of dying young in this particular case, at least; it was more a question of dividing his time between singing and administrative work. He was a man with a cause, and that takes a lot of energy and time away form the artistic career. Thanks, again!
Oh, wow! What a beautiful voice! I have to admit I have never heard Josef Sterkens sing, but what a treat. Such a pretty voice. I wish there were more recordings of him!
Martha
Thank you, Martha. Always nice to hear from you! Yes, there are few recordings. You can hear a little more if you go to the Youtube channel Jozefsterkens2.com That's where they all are.
Thanks again,
The voice is certainly beautiful, I agree. I personally feel he is more of a leggiero than a lyric, however.
Jeff
Well, as some of my readers know, I have a kind of thing about the many shadings of terminology applied to operatic voices. If you like the term "leggiero," then I certainly would not disagree. It's a light voice, call it what you will. I personally think "lyric" covers a pretty wide range. I have even made the point, on at least one occasion I can recall, that as far as I'm concerned, we could go with the choral SATB distinctions and make as much sense as we currently do:) So many of the finer distinctions in voices, when you get down to it, are simply the qualities of individual voices, as opposed to being the characteristics of types of voices.
Not a very big voice, but it sure is pretty!
Mark G.
That's a pretty good, if very succinct description, Mark:-)
A voice of quality. I have to resist calling him a "leggero" because we are not in Italy or the Italian repertoire. We must learn the language. I am not aware of any specific Flemish or Dutch categories, but it would seem appropriate to call him a Lyrischer Tenor or perhaps a light Jugendlicher Heldentenor. Of course those with more experience with Germanic classifications can please correct me if necessary. Certainly if he was of the French-speaking part of Belgium he would have been a demi-caractère, and probably one good enough to challenge Thill.
As often, a shame that nasty politics interfered with his career. I think, besides any vocal questions, singing a role such as Don Carlo would have been completely unacceptable for a tenor in his position.
Gioacchino Fiurezi-Maragioglio
Thank you very much, my friend! A superb comment; knowledgeable and incisive. You are right in that you establish the proper delineations, cultural, personal, and vocal, within which his career must be considered. That makes all the difference, as it makes it possible to appreciate him for what he was and what he did. Everyone points first and foremost to the beauty of the voice--that is key. Putting all other considerations aside, the beautiful voice in and of itself merits our admiring attention. Again, thanks!
He could have made a big international career, if it were not for politics. Sad. Thanks for the article on this wonderful artist. The voice is beautiful and the singing is masterful and intelligent. His high C sharp reminded me of Lemeshev;it sounded almost as his high notes on mezzo voce.
I didn’t know that there were such political problems in Belgium.
n.a.
I Love this post, so much great information that's really really useful to know! .... Awesome post!!! Have a beautiful Monday Evening! Thanks, dear Edmund and *GOD BLESS*
To Natalie: Yes, the political problems have been very severe, as so often happens when different cultures square off in the same geographical area. I suppose it is somewhat similar to the situation of Quebec in Canada, at least during some periods when nationalistic forces arise. The forces of Flemish nationalism have become focussed again quite recently, and there has been increasing discussion, since 2008, of the whole issue, which is vexed to say the least. Thanks for mentioning Lemeshev. I had neglected to do so in the article, but there are passages where I also think of Lemeshev's voice.
To Mr. Santos: Thank you!
Post a Comment